Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sacco, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Right arrow Antiplatelets
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks

(Stroke. 2000;31:983-a.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Supplement to the AHA Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks

Richard L. Hughes, MD

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado

To the Editor:

I must respectfully disagree with the recent AHA Scientific Statement on the management of transient ischemic attacks.1

First, the inclusion of the combination antiplatelet agent extended release dipyridamole and aspirin (ERDP/ASA) as a "recommended therapy" is premature. The current data are insufficient to definitively establish that ERDP/ASA offers anything in addition to aspirin alone. Although the results of the ESPS-2 trial2 of ERDP/ASA are encouraging and generate great optimism for this and other combination strategies, serious questions remain. The ESPS-2 results are highly inconsistent with previous data on 5317 patients treated with the combination.3 Although a heterogeneous set of trials, these data were sufficient to all but abandon use of dipyridamole in the 1980s. Further, the high rate of subject dropout,2 the lack of any benefit in vascular death despite the stunning benefit in stroke,2 the 50-mg dose of ASA,2 4 and the scientific misconduct5 discovered in the trial collectively make ESPS-2 inadequate to certify ERDP/ASA as an established therapy by the AHA or any other body.6 Any new scientific finding that is a large departure from previous data or theory requires independent conformation. Such is true of ERDP/ASA.

Second, a variety of commonly used antithrombotic strategies deserve mention with ERDP/ASA as potentially useful, if unproven, alternatives. This includes the use of clopidogrel or ticlopidine with aspirin,7 8 9 a well-accepted standard for poststenting prophylaxis. For some warfarin patients, the addition of any antiplatelet agent can help also.10 11 Further, for those who are impressed with the dramatic ESPS-2 results of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Gregory W. Albers, , MD

Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

Robert G. Hart, MD

Department of Medicine/Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Helmi L. Lutsep, MD

Oregon Stroke Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon

David W. Newell, MD

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Ralph L. Sacco, MD

Neurological Institute, Columbia–Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY