Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:1566-1571

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AbuRahma, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mowery, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AbuRahma, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mowery, N. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy

(Stroke. 2000;31:1566.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Perioperative and Late Stroke Rates of Carotid Endarterectomy Contralateral to Carotid Artery Occlusion

Results From a Randomized Trial

Presented at the 25th American Heart Association International Stroke Conference, New Orleans, La, February 10–12, 2000.

Ali F. AbuRahma, MD; Patrick Robinson, MD; Steven M. Holt, MD; Thomas A. Herzog, MD Nathan T. Mowery, MS

From the Department of Surgery, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center of West Virginia University, Charleston Area Medical Center (A.F.A., S.M.H., T.A.H., N.T.M.), and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, Conn (P.R.).

Correspondence to Ali F. AbuRahma, MD, 3100 MacCorkle Ave SE, Suite 603, Charleston, WV 25304. E-mail ali.aburahma{at}camcare.com

Background and Purpose—Several previous studies have reported the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to carotid occlusion with mixed results, but none of these were randomized except for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of surgery in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion in a randomized trial in which randomization was done according to the method of closure.

Methods—In 399 CEAs (357 patients) that were randomized into primary closure versus patching, 49 had contralateral occlusion. Strokes were designated as ipsilateral if they arose from the same CEA side and contralateral if they arose from the occluded side. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate perioperative strokes and stroke-free survival in patients with contralateral occlusion (group A) versus those without contralateral occlusion (group B).

Results—Demographic characteristics and mean follow-up for both groups were similar (group A, 40 months; group B, 33 months). Group A had a higher incidence of contralateral transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (12.2% versus 0.9%; P<0.0001), contralateral strokes (2% versus 0%; P=0.025), and combined contralateral TIAs/strokes (14.3% versus 0.9%; P<0.0001). The rates for perioperative and all strokes (operative and late) were 2% and 4.1% (2% ipsilateral and 2% contralateral strokes) for group A and 2.9% and 3.4% (all ipsilateral) for group B (P=0.60 and 0.85, respectively). The rates for perioperative and all TIAs were 0% and 14.3% for group A versus 2.6% and 6.3% for group B (P=0.918 and P=0.08, respectively). The rates for perioperative and all neurological events (TIA and stroke) were 2% and 18.4% for group A and 5.4% and 9.7% for group B (P=0.27 and 0.113, respectively). The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 5 years were 84% for group A and 77% for group B (P>0.1). The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 5 years for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in group A and group B were also similar. The perioperative and late deaths were similar for both groups (group A, 8%; group B, 14%).

Conclusions—Group A had a higher incidence of contralateral TIAs and strokes than group B; however, the perioperative and all late stroke rates and survival rates of CEA were comparable in patients with and without contralateral occlusion.


Key Words: carotid artery occlusion • carotid endarterectomy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
J. J. Alexander, J. Moawad, and D. Super
Outcome Analysis of Carotid Artery Occlusion
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2007; 41(5): 409 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Ballotta, G. Da Giau, G. Santarello, G. Meneghetti, M. Gruppo, C. Militello, and C. Baracchini
Natural History of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion Contralateral to Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2007; 41(3): 206 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sabeti, M. Schillinger, W. Mlekusch, T. Nachtmann, W. Lang, R. Ahmadi, and E. Minar
Contralateral High-Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis or Occlusion Is Not Associated with Increased Risk for Poor Neurologic Outcome after Elective Carotid Stent Placement
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Hendrikse, D. R. Rutgers, C. J.M. Klijn, B. C. Eikelboom, and J. van der Grond
Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy on Primary Collateral Blood Flow in Patients With Severe Carotid Artery Lesions
Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1650 - 1654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. R. Rutgers, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, B. C. Eikelboom, A. C. van Huffelen, and J. van der Grond
Sustained Bilateral Hemodynamic Benefit of Contralateral Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion
Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]