(Stroke. 2000;31:1728.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Neurology, Medical University Lübeck (G.S., C.A., A.C., T.K.), and the Department of Neurology, Justus Liebig University Giessen (M.K.) (Germany).
Correspondence to Priv-Doz Dr Günter Seidel, MD, Department of Neurology, Medical University at Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany. E-mail seidel_g{at}neuro.mu-luebeck.de
Background and PurposeIt is unclear which harmonic imaging mode (power Doppler or gray-scale imaging) is superior and which measuring method is the most robust for the description of brain perfusion.
MethodsWe performed an animal study on 6 beagles through the intact skull using a SONOS 5500 device and Optison injected intravenously in 3 different doses (0.15, 0.3, and 0.6 mL). Intensity versus heart-cycle plots for the brain parenchyma and the basal cerebral arteries were generated to evaluate the peak increase (PI) from baseline and the area under the curve (AUC).
ResultsWith harmonic gray-scale imaging, a homogeneous increase in echo contrast of the brain parenchyma was observed. The effect was dose dependent, resulting in a significant increase in PI as well as an insignificant increase of the AUC with 0.3 mL versus 0.15 mL contrast agent (P=0.03 and P=0.65, respectively; n=5). With harmonic power Doppler, injection of the 3 different doses resulted in a nonsignificant increase in PI and AUC P=0.17, n=6 for both). After normalization of the brain signal to the peak arterial signal in individual dogs, a significant increase could be demonstrated (P=0.03 and P=0.01, respectively; n=6). The signal pattern of harmonic power Doppler was inhomogeneous, with stronger signal increases in the anterior part of the brain.
ConclusionsGray-scale imaging leads to a more homogeneous increase in echo contrast of the brain tissue and may be more suitable for displaying brain perfusion. The PI of the signal intensity seems the most robust parameter for the description of cerebral perfusion with both imaging modes under investigation.
Department of Neurology University Hospital of Zürich Zürich, Switzerland
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Shiogai, N. Takayasu, T. Mizuno, M. Nakagawa, and H. Furuhata Comparison of Transcranial Brain Tissue Perfusion Images Between Ultraharmonic, Second Harmonic, and Power Harmonic Imaging Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Meves, W. Wilkening, T. Thies, J. Eyding, T. Holscher, M. Finger, G. Schmid, H. Ermert, and T. Postert Comparison Between Echo Contrast Agent-Specific Imaging Modes and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Brain Perfusion Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2433 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. U. Harrer and C. Klotzsch Second Harmonic Imaging of the Human Brain: The Practicability of Coronal Insonation Planes and Alternative Perfusion Parameters Stroke, June 1, 2002; 33(6): 1530 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Rim, H. Leong-Poi, J. R. Lindner, D. Couture, D. Ellegala, H. Mason, M. Durieux, N. F. Kassel, and S. Kaul Quantification of Cerebral Perfusion With "Real-Time" Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2582 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |