Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, F. d. N. A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Reding, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, F. d. N. A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Reding, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2001;32:107.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke

Fátima de N. A. P. Shelton, MD Michael J. Reding, MD

From the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City (F.d.N.A.P.S.); and The Weill Medical College of Cornell University at The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY (M.J.R.).

Correspondence to Fátima de N.A.P. Shelton, MD, OUHSC Department of Neurology, 711 Stanton L. Young Blvd, Suite 209, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. E-mail fshelton{at}dnamail.com

Background and Purpose—The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of stroke involvement of primary and secondary hemispheric motor systems and corticofugal tracts on arm and hand recovery.

Methods—Forty-one patients participating in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation database, admitted 17±2 (SEM) days after initial unilateral hemispheric ischemic stroke, with neuroimaging studies performed >48 hours after stroke and with minimal upper limb (UL) movement (admission Fugl-Meyer UL motor scores <=9; normal score, 58) were studied. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their UL discharge Fugl-Meyer score: 0 to 9, no/poor recovery; 10 to 18, well-defined flexion-extension synergies; and >18, synergies+isolated movements. Lesions affecting the following structures were recorded: primary motor cortex, premotor area, supplementary motor area, anterior half of the middle third of corona radiata (secondary motor efferents), posterior half of the middle third of corona radiata (primary motor efferents), genu, anterior and posterior limbs of the internal capsule (PLIC), basal ganglia, and thalamus. {chi}2 Analysis and ANOVA were used to study the significance of stroke location on UL motor recovery.

Results—The effect of involvement of primary, premotor, or supplementary motor areas on motor recovery did not reach statistical significance. Patients with purely cortical stroke were likely to recover UL isolated movement (3 of 4) compared with purely subcortical (1 of 17) or mixed cortical-subcortical stroke location (2 of 20) (P=0.009). Of those with cortical, subcortical, or mixed cortical plus subcortical lesions sparing the PLIC, 5 of 13 recovered isolated UL movement (P=0.01). Only 1 of 28 patients with involvement of the PLIC plus adjacent corona radiata, basal ganglia, or thalamus recovered isolated UL movement (P=0.01). Patients with small lacunar strokes affecting only the PLIC did not have sufficient motor deficits 2 weeks after stroke to meet inclusion criteria.

Conclusions—The probability of recovery of isolated UL movement decreases progressively with lesion location as follows: cortex, corona radiata, and PLIC. This is consistent with our current understanding of redundant cortical motor representation and convergence of corticofugal motor efferents as they pass through the corona radiata to the PLIC.


Key Words: hemiplegia • prognosis • rehabilitation • stroke outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Ganguly, L. Secundo, G. Ranade, A. Orsborn, E. F. Chang, D. F. Dimitrov, J. D. Wallis, N. M. Barbaro, R. T. Knight, and J. M. Carmena
Cortical Representation of Ipsilateral Arm Movements in Monkey and Man
J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 12948 - 12956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, V. W. Mark, C. Perkins, and G. Uswatte
Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2468 - 2472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Rabadi, M. Galgano, D. Lynch, M Akerman, M. Lesser, and B. Volpe
A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2008; 22(12): 1071 - 1082.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. T. Volpe, D. Lynch, A. Rykman-Berland, M. Ferraro, M. Galgano, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs
Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 305 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. G. Lindberg, P. H. B. Skejo, E. Rounis, Z. Nagy, C. Schmitz, H. Wernegren, A. Bring, M. Engardt, H. Forssberg, and J. Borg
Wallerian Degeneration of the Corticofugal Tracts in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study Relating Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Hand Function
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 551 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. E. Harris and J. J. Eng
Individuals with the Dominant Hand Affected following Stroke Demonstrate Less Impairment Than Those with the Nondominant Hand Affected
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2006; 20(3): 380 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E. R Skidmore, J. C Rogers, L. S Chandler, and M. B Holm
Dynamic interactions between impairment and activity after stroke: examining the utility of decision analysis methods
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2006; 20(6): 523 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. Lotze, W. Grodd, F. A. Rodden, E. Gut, P. W. Schonle, B. Kardatzki, and L. G. Cohen
Neuroimaging Patterns Associated with Motor Control in Traumatic Brain Injury
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2006; 20(1): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
L. M. Carey, D. F. Abbott, G. F. Egan, G. J. O'Keefe, G. D. Jackson, J. Bernhardt, and G. A. Donnan
Evolution of Brain Activation with Good and Poor Motor Recovery after Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2006; 20(1): 24 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Wenzelburger, F. Kopper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossmann, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Golge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl
Hand coordination following capsular stroke
Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 64 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
T. Uozumi, A. Tamagawa, T. Hashimoto, and S. Tsuji
Motor hand representation in cortical area 44
Neurology, March 9, 2004; 62(5): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, J. van der Grond, and A. J.H. Prevo
Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2181 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. J. Morecraft, J. L. Herrick, K. S. Stilwell-Morecraft, J. L. Louie, C. M. Schroeder, J. G. Ottenbacher, and M. W. Schoolfield
Localization of arm representation in the corona radiata and internal capsule in the non-human primate
Brain, January 1, 2002; 125(1): 176 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]