Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2001;32:2211-2212

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinmuth, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reinmuth, O. M.

(Stroke. 2001;32:2211.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Stroke: 30 Years of Progress

1987–1991

Oscar M. Reinmuth, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Arizona, Tucson.

Correspondence to Dr Oscar Reinmuth, Department of Neurology, University of Arizona, Science Center, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85274-4147.

It is a pleasure to reflect on my term as editor of Stroke. There were many accomplishments that led to an increased understanding of stroke and its management during that period, and many changes in the journal itself.

Perhaps the most conspicuous change in Stroke occurred in 1988, when the journal moved from bimonthly to monthly publication. By 1989 there was a 50% increase, from 1987, in studies published in Stroke. This figure suggests that not only was there an increasing amount of research published, but that its quality did not appear to have been diluted. Further, it is likely that the overall time to publication of stroke-related research was substantially shortened by monthly publication. It must be noted that these changes could not have been accomplished without a cadre of diligent reviewers and the devotion and hard work of Nancy Lynch Clark, who served as managing editor throughout my tenure. It is they who made the journal larger, with no loss of scientific integrity.

Stroke grew in other ways as well. The subject index and glossary of terms were standardized, using MeSH headings, and an in-house abstracts editor. This was the first and only time that the abstracts editor was not a physician. Submission rates also grew every year until 1990, including a 17% increase in 1989. However, there was a 9% decrease in 1990, probably because 2 new stroke journals, including the European stroke journal, were initiated during that year.

Concerning the evolution of the study . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Hachinski
Stroke: The Next 30 Years
Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]