(Stroke. 2001;32:2511.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Regional Neurosciences Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Daniel Birchall, Neuroradiology Division, Regional Neurosciences Centre, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK. E-mail daniel.birchall{at}trvi.nuth.northy.nhs.uk
Background and Purpose This study sought to determine the frequency of noncircular lumens in patients with significant carotid atherosclerotic disease and to evaluate the effect of noncircular lumens on stenosis measurement derived from angiographic projections.
Methods One hundred consecutive patients presenting with an internal carotid artery stenosis of at least 50% were imaged with spiral CT angiography. The transverse morphology of the diseased lumen was assessed on axial images, and the frequency of noncircular lumens was determined. In these cases, maximum intensity projection angiograms were reconstructed in standardized angiographic planes and in a plane selected according to the luminal obliquity, which was chosen to optimize the angiographic representation of the maximal stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) measurements were calculated from the maximum intensity projection images, and differences between values obtained from standard and optimized projections were recorded.
Results Noncircular lumens were observed in 18 of 100 patients and consisted of elliptical and linear transverse profiles. The transverse orientation of the lumen in these cases ranged from +90° to -87° relative to the anteroposterior plane. An increase in the calculated NASCET stenosis was demonstrated when measurements were obtained from angiographic reconstructions obtained in the exact plane of the luminal obliquity compared with standard angiographic projections. As a result, the stenosis severity was upgraded from moderate to severe in 2 patients.
Conclusions Noncircular transverse luminal profiles are not uncommon and may introduce error into NASCET calculations obtained from standard angiographic projections.
Key Words: carotid CT angiography
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, and E. S. Bartlett Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence? Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3411 - 3412. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Wang, D. Saloner, and J. H. Rapp Characteristics of Carotid Plaque as Risk Factors for Stroke Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2004; 16(3): 193 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. U-King-Im, R. A. Trivedi, M. J. Graves, N. J. Higgins, J. J. Cross, B. D. Tom, W. Hollingworth, H. Eales, E. A. Warburton, P. J. Kirkpatrick, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for carotid disease: Diagnostic and potential clinical impact Neurology, April 27, 2004; 62(8): 1282 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. U-King-Im, R. Trivedi, J. H. Gillard, D. C.C. Johnston, J. D. Eastwood, and L. B. Goldstein Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Carotid Arteries * Response Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34 (5): e15 - e15. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Corti, M. Alerci, R. Wyttenbach, P. L. Pedrazzi, A. Gallino, T. Hirai, and Y. Korogi Usefulness of Multiplanar Reconstructions in Evaluation of Carotid CT Angiography * Drs Hirai and Korogi respond: Radiology, January 1, 2003; 226(1): 290 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |