(Stroke. 2001;32:479.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Role of the Distal Balloon Protection Technique in the Prevention of Cerebral Embolic Events During Carotid Stent Placement
Presented at the Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting; November 29–December 4, 1998; Chicago, Ill.
From the Department of Radiology (J-B.M., K.J.M., P.G., K.S., D.A.R.), Division of Clinical Pathology (J-C.P., E.P.), Surgical Intensive Care Unit (M.T-V.), and Neuropathology Unit (G.P.), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md (K.J.M., P.G.); Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroangiography, Hospital General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain (K.J.M., P.G.); and Department of Radiology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France (J.T.).
Correspondence to J-B. Martin, MD, Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Micheli-du-Crest 24, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. E-mail Jean-Baptiste.Martin{at}dim.hcuge.ch
Background and Purpose—We sought to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the release of atheromatous plaque debris induced by carotid stenting procedures.
Methods—Eight patients with severe carotid atheromatous stenoses were treated by stent implantation under distal balloon protection. Blood samplings were obtained after stent deployment in the blood pooled below the inflated protection balloon. The samples were centrifuged and evaluated for plaque debris with the use of light microscopy. The debris release was quantitatively estimated by dividing the total volume of debris obtained by the mean debris size. Five patients without endovascular procedure were used as a control group.
Results—The 2 main debris types found were nonrefringent cholesterol crystals (4 to 389 µm; 115 to 8697 in number) and lipoid masses (7 to 600 µm; 341 to 34 000 in number). There was a statistically significant difference compared with the samples obtained in the control group (P=0.017).
Conclusions—Blood samples collected during stent implantation procedures contain a large quantity of atheromatous plaque debris. This emphasizes the role of distal protection techniques in avoiding migration of this plaque material into the cerebral circulation.
Key Words: atherosclerosis • carotid stenosis • protection device • stents
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. D. Talenfeld, R. B. Schwope, H. J. Alper, E. I. Cohen, and R. A. Lookstein MDCT Angiography of the Renal Arteries in Patients with Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Implications for Renal Artery Stenting with Distal Protection Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1652 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. P. Liew and J. R Bartholomew Atheromatous embolization Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2005; 10(4): 309 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Zahn, T. Ischinger, B. Mark, S. Gass, U. Zeymer, W. Schmalz, K. Haerten, K. E. Hauptmann, E.-R. von Leitner, W. Kasper, et al. Embolic Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting: Is There a Difference Between Filter and Distal Occlusive Devices? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1769 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Lownie, D. M. Pelz, D. H. Lee, S. Men, I. Gulka, and P. Kalapos Efficacy of Treatment of Severe Carotid Bifurcation Stenosis By Using Self-Expanding Stents without Deliberate Use of Angioplasty Balloons AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Zahn, B. Mark, N. Niedermaier, U. Zeymer, P. Limbourg, T. Ischinger, K. Haerten, K. E. Hauptmann, E.-R. v. Leitner, W. Kasper, et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1550 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Linfante, J. A. Hirsch, M. Selim, G. Schlaug, L. R. Caplan, and A. S. Reddy Safety of Latest-Generation Self-expanding Stents in Patients With NASCET-Ineligible Severe Symptomatic Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Arch Neurol, January 1, 2004; 61(1): 39 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Wittkugel, J. Fiehler, C. Koch, B. Eckert, E. Kilic, M. Frahm, and H. Zeumer Endovascular Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Effect of Primary Stent Application on Debris Particle Release in Human Cadaveric Specimens Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 855 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kastrup, K. Groschel, H. Krapf, B. R. Brehm, J. Dichgans, and J. B. Schulz Early Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection Devices: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Fox Jr, C. J. Moran, D. T. Cross III, R. L. Grubb Jr, K. M. Rich, M. R. Chicoine, R. G. Dacey Jr, and C. P. Derdeyn Long-Term Outcome After Angioplasty for Symptomatic Extracranial Carotid Stenosis in Poor Surgical Candidates Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2877 - 2880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H. Brooks, R. R. McClure, M. R. Jones, T. C. Coleman, and L. Breathitt Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1589 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|