This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Derby, C. A. Articles by Carleton, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Derby, C. A. Articles by Carleton, R. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Embolic stroke Epidemiology

(Stroke. 2001;32:1487.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Possible Effect of DRGs on the Classification of Stroke

Implications for Epidemiological Surveillance

Carol A. Derby, PhD; Kate L. Lapane, PhD; Henry A. Feldman, PhD Richard A. Carleton, MD

From the New England Research Institutes (C.A.D., H.A.F.), Watertown, Mass; the Department of Community Health (K.L.L.), Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI; and the Division of Cardiology, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, and the Department of Medicine (R.A.C.), Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI.

Background and Purpose—Accurate data on the distribution of stroke subtypes are essential for understanding the forces driving recent morbidity and mortality trends. The introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in the 1980s may have affected the distribution of stroke subtypes as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), discharge diagnosis codes.

Methods—The Pawtucket Heart Health Program cardiovascular surveillance data were used to examine trends in stroke classification for 1980 to 1991 in relation to the introduction of DRGs in 2 communities in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, where DRGs were implemented 2 years apart. Included were all hospital discharges for residents aged 35 to 74 with a primary ICD-9 diagnosis of 431 to 432, 434, or 436 to 437 (N=1386 in Rhode Island, N=1839 in Massachusetts).

Results—In each state, concurrently with the introduction of DRGs, the proportion of strokes classified as cerebral occlusion (ICD-9 434.0 to 434.9) increased, and the proportion classified as acute but ill-defined (ICD-9 436.0 to 436.9) decreased. Before DRGs, 30.0% of strokes in Rhode Island and 26.6% in Massachusetts were classified as cerebral occlusion, whereas 51.8% in Rhode Island and 51.7% in Massachusetts were classified as acute ill defined. After DRGs were instituted, the proportions of cerebral occlusion and acute, ill-defined stroke, respectively, were 70.9% and 8.5% in Rhode Island and 74.1% and 7.7% in Massachusetts (², all P<0.001). The proportions of strokes classified as intracerebral hemorrhage or transient cerebral ischemia remained constant.

Conclusions—The implementation of DRGs may have influenced coding of strokes to the ICD-9. Findings highlight the limitations of hospital discharge data for evaluating stroke subtypes and demonstrate the need for community-based surveillance for monitoring specific trends in stroke.

Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders • diagnostic-related groups • population surveillance • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Piriyawat, M. Smajsova, M. A. Smith, S. Pallegar, A. Al-Wabil, N. M. Garcia, J. M. Risser, L. A. Moye, and L. B. Morgenstern Comparison of Active and Passive Surveillance for Cerebrovascular Disease: The Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 156(11): 1062 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]