(Stroke. 2002;33:87.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Massachusetts General Hospital NMR Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (K.Y., O.W., R.G.G., D.B., W.A.C., R.M.W., B.R.R., A.G.S.); Departments of Radiology (K.Y., T.N.) and Mathematics (K.Y.), Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; and Department of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospitals, Aarhus, Denmark (L.Ø.).
Reprints requests to Kei Yamada, Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cyo, Kawaramachi Hirokoji Sagaru, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, Japan 602-8566. E-mail kyamada{at}koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Background and Purpose Various calculation methods are available to estimate the transit-time on MR perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI). Each method may affect the results of PWI. Steno-occlusive disease in the parent vessels is another factor that may affect the results of the PWI. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of the calculation methods and underlying vasculopathy on PWI.
Methods From a pool of 113 patients who had undergone PWI during the study period, a total of 12 patients with nonlacunar ischemic strokes who were scanned within 24 hours after onset of symptom were selected for the study. The patient population consisted of 6 patients who had extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis (>70%) and 6 individuals without stenosis. Seven different postprocessing methods were evaluated: first moment, ratio of area to peak, time to peak (TTP), relative TTP, arrival time, full-width at half-maximum, and deconvolution methods. Follow-up MR or CT images were used to determine the areas that evolved into infarcts, which served as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of each transit time technique were calculated.
Results Calculation methods with high sensitivity were the first moment (sensitivity, 74%), TTP (sensitivity, 77%), and deconvolution methods (sensitivity, 81% to 94%). Between the 2 groups with and without internal carotid artery stenosis, the specificity of most of the techniques was lower in the internal carotid artery stenosis group. The first moment and deconvolution methods maintained relatively high specificity even in the stenosis group.
Conclusions The calculation technique and presence of underlying vasculopathy have a direct impact on the results of PWI. The methods with high sensitivity even in the presence of steno-occlusive disease were the first moment and deconvolution methods with arterial input function derived from the peri-infarct arteries; the deconvolution method was the superior choice because of higher lesion conspicuity.
Key Words: brain diffusion magnetic resonance imaging perfusion stroke, acute
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Zaro-Weber, W. Moeller-Hartmann, W.-D. Heiss, and J. Sobesky The Performance of MRI-Based Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements in Acute and Subacute Stroke Compared With 15O-Water Positron Emission Tomography: Identification of Penumbral Flow Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2413 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Christensen, K. Mouridsen, O. Wu, N. Hjort, H. Karstoft, G. Thomalla, J. Rother, J. Fiehler, T. Kucinski, and L. Ostergaard Comparison of 10 Perfusion MRI Parameters in 97 Sub-6-Hour Stroke Patients Using Voxel-Based Receiver Operating Characteristics Analysis Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 2055 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kudo, M. Sasaki, K. Ogasawara, S. Terae, S. Ehara, and H. Shirato Difference in Tracer Delay-induced Effect among Deconvolution Algorithms in CT Perfusion Analysis: Quantitative Evaluation with Digital Phantoms Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kane, T. Carpenter, F. Chappell, C. Rivers, P. Armitage, P. Sandercock, and J. Wardlaw Comparison of 10 Different Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging Processing Methods in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Effect on Lesion Size, Proportion of Patients With Diffusion/Perfusion Mismatch, Clinical Scores, and Radiologic Outcomes Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3158 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.S. Kim, S.Y. Kim, and J.M. Kim Underestimation of Cerebral Perfusion on Flow-Sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery Image: Semiquantitative Evaluation with Time-to-Peak Values AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 2008 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Waaijer, M. S. van Leeuwen, M. J.P. van Osch, B. H. van der Worp, F. L. Moll, R. T. H. Lo, W. P. T. M. Mali, and M. Prokop Changes in Cerebral Perfusion after Revascularization of Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: CT Measurement Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 541 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Waaijer, I.C. van der Schaaf, B.K. Velthuis, M. Quist, M.J.P. van Osch, E.P.A. Vonken, M.S. van Leeuwen, and M. Prokop Reproducibility of Quantitative CT Brain Perfusion Measurements in Patients with Symptomatic Unilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 927 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.G. Gonzalez Imaging-guided acute ischemic stroke therapy: From "time is brain" to "physiology is brain". AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, R. Zopf, L. Johannsen, M. F. Berger, T. Nagele, and U. Klose Normalized perfusion MRI to identify common areas of dysfunction: patients with basal ganglia neglect Brain, October 1, 2005; 128(10): 2462 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Szabo, A. Poepel, B. Pohlmann-Eden, J. Hirsch, T. Back, O. Sedlaczek, M. Hennerici, and A. Gass Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI demonstrates parenchymal changes in complex partial status epilepticus Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1369 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.S. Butcher, M. Parsons, L. MacGregor, P.A. Barber, J. Chalk, C. Bladin, C. Levi, T. Kimber, D. Schultz, J. Fink, et al. Refining the Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Hypothesis Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1153 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sobesky, O. Z. Weber, F.-G. Lehnhardt, V. Hesselmann, M. Neveling, A. Jacobs, and W.-D. Heiss Does the Mismatch Match the Penumbra?: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in Early Ischemic Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 980 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hjort, K. Butcher, S.M. Davis, C.S. Kidwell, on behalf of the UCLA Thrombolysis Investigators, W.J. Koroshetz, J. Rother, P.D. Schellinger, S. Warach, and L. Ostergaard Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for Thrombolysis in Acute Cerebral Infarct Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 388 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sobesky, O. Z. Weber, F.-G. Lehnhardt, V. Hesselmann, A. Thiel, C. Dohmen, A. Jacobs, M. Neveling, and W.-D. Heiss Which Time-to-Peak Threshold Best Identifies Penumbral Flow?: A Comparison of Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2843 - 2847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Rose, A. L. Janke, M. Griffin, S. Finnigan, and J. B. Chalk Improved Prediction of Final Infarct Volume Using Bolus Delay-Corrected Perfusion-Weighted MRI: Implications for the Ischemic Penumbra Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2466 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fiehler, T. Kucinski, K. Knudsen, M. Rosenkranz, G. Thomalla, C. Weiller, J. Rother, and H. Zeumer Are There Time-Dependent Differences in Diffusion and Perfusion Within the First 6 Hours After Stroke Onset? Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2099 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Butcher, M. Parsons, T. Baird, A. Barber, G. Donnan, P. Desmond, B. Tress, and S. Davis Perfusion Thresholds in Acute Stroke Thrombolysis Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2159 - 2164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mukherjee, H. C. Kang, T. O. Videen, R. C. McKinstry, W. J. Powers, and C. P. Derdeyn Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow in Chronic Carotid Occlusive Disease: Comparison of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MR Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 862 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Schaefer, Y. Ozsunar, J. He, L. M. Hamberg, G. J. Hunter, A. G. Sorensen, W. J. Koroshetz, and R. G. Gonzalez Assessing Tissue Viability with MR Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 436 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Eastwood, M. H. Lev, and J. M. Provenzale Perfusion CT with Iodinated Contrast Material Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 3 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Arenillas, A. Rovira, C. A. Molina, E. Grive, J. Montaner, J. Alvarez-Sabin, and K.-O. Lovblad Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration Using Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging in Hyperacute Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke * Editorial Comment Stroke, September 1, 2002; 33(9): 2197 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wintermark, M. Reichhart, O. Cuisenaire, P. Maeder, J.-P. Thiran, P. Schnyder, J. Bogousslavsky, and R. Meuli Comparison of Admission Perfusion Computed Tomography and Qualitative Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2025 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |