Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:2347-2348
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000033481.56109.97
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barth, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barth, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sitzer, M.

(Stroke. 2002;33:2347.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Patient Selection for Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting

Alain Barth, MD

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

Claudio Bassetti, MD

Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

We read with interest the article by Dietz et al1 recently published in Stroke. The authors report the clinical results of a consecutive series of 43 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis treated by angioplasty and stenting. We would like to express concern about the selection of patients for endovascular treatment in this study.

In the title and within the article, the authors emphasize the selection of patients according to the prognostic model of Rothwell et al2 for carotid endarterectomy. This model was developed from data gathered in the European Carotid Surgery Trial3 (ECST) to identify the best candidates for surgical treatment as opposed to medical therapy alone. The model included 2 sets of prognostic factors for medical and surgical adverse events and provided a score from 0 to 5 that predicted benefit (>=4), no significant benefit (>1 to <4), or potential harm (<=1) of the operation. The conclusion drawn from Rothwell et al was to exclude patients with scores <4 from the operation and to treat them exclusively with prophylactic medical therapy.

The prognostic model was developed from data on patients with 0% to 69% carotid stenosis in the ECST and then tested and validated on 990 ECST patients with 70% to 99% carotid stenosis assigned to surgery (594) or medical therapy alone (396). To the best of our knowledge, the prognostic model has not yet been validated by institutions other than ECST Collaborative Group, especially not by single centers confronted with the selection of individual patients . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joachim Berkefeld, MD

Institute of Neuroradiology

Matthias Sitzer, MD

Department of Neurology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. D. Hill, N. J. Newcommon, and M. Bursztyn
Diurnal Variance in Stroke Onset
Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34 (3): 589 - 590.
[Full Text]