This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zunker, P. Articles by Deuschl, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zunker, P. Articles by Deuschl, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Related Collections Angiography Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

(Stroke. 2002;33:2600.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Echo Contrast–Enhanced Transcranial Ultrasound

Frequency of Use, Diagnostic Benefit, and Validity of Results Compared With MRA

Peter Zunker, PhD, MD; Henrik Wilms, MD; Joachim Brossmann, MD; Dimitrios Georgiadis, MD; Sepp Weber, MD Günther Deuschl, MD

From the Department of Neurology (P.Z., H.W., G.D.) and Institute of Radiology (J.B.), Kiel University Hospital, Kiel; Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg (D.G.); and Schering Deutschland GmbH, Berlin (S.W.), Germany.

Correspondence to Peter Zunker, PhD, MD, Ita-Wegman-Hospital, 4144 Arlesheim, Switzerland. E-mail peter.zunker{at}wegmanklinik.ch

Background and Purpose— The present study was undertaken to determine the frequency of use of the ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) Levovist in routine transcranial ultrasound (TU). Additionally, we evaluated the diagnostic validity of contrast-enhanced TU using 3-dimensional time of flight MR angiography.

Methods— Indication for the UCA was an insufficient evaluation of the intracranial arteries after a combined approach with transcranial color-coded Duplex and transcranial Doppler examination. We prospectively analyzed every patient referred for TU over 6 months. Additionally, over a 3-month period, TU results were compared with 3-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography .

Results— Indication for use of UCA was met in 61 of 687 patients (8.8%). After UCA application, a diagnostic result was achieved in 75% of cases during transtemporal and in 81% during transforaminal insonation. The sensitivity and specificity of TU in the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis were 83% and 82%, respectively.

Conclusions— Use of UCA was necessary in 8.8% of the patients. A diagnostic benefit was achieved in 75% to 80% of cases. Contrast-enhanced TU demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis.

Key Words: cerebral arteries • contrast media • ultrasonics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kunz, G. Hahn, D. Mucha, A. Muller, K.M. Barrett, R. von Kummer, and G. Gahn Echo-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography in the Diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Events: A Validation Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2122 - 2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Sloan, A. V. Alexandrov, C. H. Tegeler, M. P. Spencer, L. R. Caplan, E. Feldmann, L. R. Wechsler, D. W. Newell, C. R. Gomez, V. L. Babikian, et al. Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology, May 11, 2004; 62(9): 1468 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]