doi: 10.1161/hs0302.103815
(Stroke. 2002;33:762.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Handicap After Stroke: How Does It Relate to Disability, Perception of Recovery, and Stroke Subtype?
The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)
From the National Stroke Research Institute and Department of Neurology (J.S., H.M.D., G.A.D., R.A.L.M., A.G.T.), Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Department of Medicine (G.A.D., R.A.L.M.), The University of Melbourne, Australia, and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (J.J.M., A.G.T.), Monash Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Dr Jonathan Sturm, National Stroke Research Institute, Repatriation Campus, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Banksia Street, West Heidelberg, Victoria 3081, Australia. E-mail jsturm{at}austin.unimelb.edu.au
Background and Purpose— Knowledge of patterns of handicap after stroke and of the relationship among handicap, disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype is limited. The aim of this study was to assess handicap 3 and 12 months after first-ever stroke in a community-based study.
Methods— All strokes occurring in a population of 133 816 people were found and assessed. Patients were classified as having cerebral infarction (CI) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) according to imaging or autopsy findings. Cases of CI were categorized using the Oxfordshire stroke classification. Handicap, disability, and perception of recovery were assessed 3 and 12 months after stroke using the London Handicap Scale, Barthel Index, and the question "Have you made a complete recovery from your stroke?" The association between disability and handicap was examined using Pearson’s correlation. Differences in handicap among subtypes of CI were evaluated using one-way ANOVA.
Results— There were 264 cases of CI or ICH. Of surviving patients, 113 (59%) were assessed at 3 months and 107 (64%) at 12 months. The domains of handicap most affected were physical independence and occupation. Only half the variance in handicap was due to disability. Of patients without disability, those who claimed complete recovery were less handicapped than those who claimed incomplete recovery. Patients with total anterior circulation infarction were more handicapped at 3 and 12 months than those with other subtypes of CI.
Conclusions— Stroke patients were handicapped across many domains. Handicap is only partly explained by disability. Stroke subtype should be considered in the interpretation of outcome data.
Key Words: cerebral infarction • cerebrovascular disorders • incidence • outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. J. Gallek, Y. P. Conley, P. R. Sherwood, M. B. Horowitz, A. Kassam, and S. A. Alexander APOE Genotype and Functional Outcome Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2009; 10(3): 205 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Glozier, M. L. Hackett, V. Parag, C. S. Anderson, and for the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) The Influence of Psychiatric Morbidity on Return to Paid Work After Stroke in Younger Adults: The Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003 Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1526 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Y. Chong, H. S. Lee, B. Boden-Albala, M. C. Paik, and R. L. Sacco Gender differences in self-report of recovery after stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1282 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Paul, J. W. Sturm, H. M. Dewey, G. A. Donnan, R. A.L. Macdonell, and A. G. Thrift Long-Term Outcome in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study: Predictors of Quality of Life at 5 Years After Stroke Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2082 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Sturm, G. A. Donnan, H. M. Dewey, R. A. L. Macdonell, A. K. Gilligan, V. Srikanth, and A. G. Thrift Quality of Life After Stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke, October 1, 2004; 35(10): 2340 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Sturm, G. A. Donnan, H. M. Dewey, R. A.L. Macdonell, A. K. Gilligan, and A. G. Thrift Determinants of Handicap After Stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 715 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Desrosiers, F. Malouin, D. Bourbonnais, C. L Richards, A. Rochette, and G. Bravo Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 666 - 673. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M.J. Steultjens, J. Dekker, L. M. Bouter, J. C.M. van de Nes, E. H.C. Cup, C. H.M. van den Ende, F. Landi, and R. Bernabei Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review * Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients: When, Where, and How? Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 676 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-M. Lai, S. Perera, P. W. Duncan, and R. Bode Physical and Social Functioning After Stroke: Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36 Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 488 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Sturm, R. H. Osborne, H. M. Dewey, G. A. Donnan, R. A.L. Macdonell, and A. G. Thrift Brief Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment After Stroke: The Assessment of Quality of Life Instrument in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2888 - 2894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|