Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2002;33:1341-1347
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000013663.27776.DB
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micieli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Quaglini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micieli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Quaglini, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2002;33:1341.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Guideline Compliance Improves Stroke Outcome

A Preliminary Study in 4 Districts in the Italian Region of Lombardia

Giuseppe Micieli, MD; Anna Cavallini, MD Silvana Quaglini, PhD for the Guideline Application for Decision Making in Ischemic Stroke (GLADIS) Study Group

From the Cerebrovascular Unit, C. Mondino Foundation (G.M., A.C.), and Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Pavia (S.Q.), Pavia, Italy.

Reprint requests to Giuseppe Micieli, MD, Cerebrovascular Unit, IRCCS C. Mondino, 27100 Pavia, Italy. E-mail giuseppe.micieli{at}mondino.it

Background and Purpose Guidelines for medical practice in stroke have been proposed in different countries, but their impact on stroke outcome has not been verified to date. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the American Heart Association guidelines for acute stroke and for transient ischemic attack on first-ever stroke patients.

Methods Three hundred eighty-six first-ever ischemic stroke patients were admitted to the study. Those observed within 6 hours from stroke onset were eligible for the acute clinical phase of the study, while all were admitted to the early clinical phase. The follow-up lasted 6 months. Primary end points were survival and the effectiveness of treatment on disability, measured as the proportion of potential improvement in the Barthel Index score achieved during treatment. A rating of noncompliance with the guideline recommendations was calculated for each patient, and its association with the end points was investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare survival curves between groups; Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for mortality; and correlation tests and regression analysis were used to evaluate the influence of guideline compliance on disability. Both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed.

Results Survival and treatment effectiveness were directly correlated with guideline compliance. The relative risk of death for patients with a noncompliance rating >=5 was 2.26 with respect to patients with a noncompliance rating <5 (95% CI, 1.51 to 4.67; P<0.0007). In this latter group, at 6 months we detected a 15% decrease in mortality (95% CI, 9.1% to 17.5%). Treatment effectiveness showed a Spearman’s rank correlation with the noncompliance rating of -0.3 (P<0.001). At discharge we observed a 13% increase in treatment effectiveness, while no significant differences were detectable at 3 and 6 months. These associations were confirmed by the multivariate analysis, in which we included, together with the noncompliance rating, all the variables previously identified as independent predictors of mortality and disability.

Conclusions This study demonstrates an association between adherence to guidelines and stroke outcome, and it can be viewed as a study that prepares the way for a randomized controlled trial in this area. It also emphasizes the need to develop personnel and structures devoted to stroke care because an evidence-based clinical approach could significantly reduce the risk of death.


Key Words: disability evaluation • mortality • practice guidelines • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Wettermark, A. Persson, and M. von Euler
Secondary Prevention in a Large Stroke Population: A Study of Patients' Purchase of Recommended Drugs
Stroke, October 1, 2008; 39(10): 2880 - 2885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Norrving, P. Wester, K. S. Sunnerhagen, A. Terent, A. Sohlberg, F. Berggren, P.-O. Wester, K. Asplund, for the Stroke Guidelines Working Group,, and National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, S
Beyond Conventional Stroke Guidelines: Setting Priorities
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2185 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. K. Kapral, A. Laupacis, S. J. Phillips, F. L. Silver, M. D. Hill, J. Fang, J. Richards, J. V. Tu, and for the Investigators of the Registry of the Canad
Stroke Care Delivery in Institutions Participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network
Stroke, July 1, 2004; 35(7): 1756 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Cavallini, G. Micieli, S. Marcheselli, and S. Quaglini
Role of Monitoring in Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
Stroke, November 1, 2003; 34(11): 2599 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]