This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/10/2434    most recent 01.STR.0000095162.75634.CEv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koennecke, H.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koennecke, H.-C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke

(Stroke. 2003;34:2434.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—Challenging the Concept of a Dynamic Penumbra in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Department of Neurology, Ev. Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, Germany

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Ever since the concept of an ischemic penumbra began receiving wider acceptance in the early 1980s,¹ much attention and endeavors has been focused on the demonstration of this "salvageable rim" in order to define the usefulness of acute stroke therapy. Several techniques have been applied to demonstrate the extent of the penumbra in acute stroke in humans. Besides that these techniques are mostly very complex and therefore far from being accessible to a considerable proportion of acute stroke patients, the interpretation and generalization of their results in human stroke are complicated by several factors. First, the ischemic penumbra is considered an unstable, dynamic, and transient condition. Moreover, aside from time since onset, several factors like residual/collateral blood flow, metabolic parameters (eg, glucose), temperature, and the anatomical resolution of the technique applied further contribute to a patient’s "individual" penumbra.² This is reflected by the fact that, second, flow thresholds for various states of tissue perfusion differ considerably among studies and techniques applied.³ Third, given the complexity and effort associated with the majority of methods capable of measuring penumbral tissue, most of our current knowledge derives from rather small cohorts and may not be applicable to subgroups of ischemic stroke, like lacunar infarction.

On first gaze, the retrospective study by Jovin et al is not much different from former studies, as it applies a very sophisticated technique (xenon-enhanced CT cerebral blood flow [Xe-CT CBF]) to a small cohort (n=36) of severely affected patients (median NIHSS score, 18) with occlusion of the middle . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Latchaw, M. J. Alberts, M. H. Lev, J. J. Connors, R. E. Harbaugh, R. T. Higashida, R. Hobson, C. S. Kidwell, W. J. Koroshetz, V. Mathews, et al. Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3646 - 3678. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Rosenthal, L.H. Schwamm, L. Roccatagliata, S.B. Coutts, A.M. Demchuk, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, M.D. Hill, E.F. Halpern, and M.H. Lev Role of Recanalization in Acute Stroke Outcome: Rationale for a CT Angiogram-Based "Benefit of Recanalization" Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1471 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]