| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:2533.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Controversies in Stroke |
From the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Steven Warach, MD, PhD, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1063, Bldg 10, Rm B1D733, Bethesda, MD 20892-1063. E-mail warachs{at}ninds.nih.gov
Key Words: cerebral blood flow magnetic resonance imaging penumbra randomized controlled trials
The idea that there exist 2 ischemic thresholds in the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction came from seminal microelectrode studies of the baboon cortex the late 1970s1,2 that measured the effects of progressive reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF). These studies described a level of CBF reduction that led to cessation of cortical evoked responses in the absence of terminal increases in extracellular potassium or reductions in pH and a yet lower level of CBF reduction, at which occurred large increases in extracellular potassium and reductions in pH indicative of failure of membrane ion homeostasis and cell death.
Derived from animals too few and results too variable to specify a precise threshold, the insight nonetheless emerged that there were 2 levels of ischemia, one for tissue dysfunction without destruction and a lower one for irreversible cell injury. The metaphor of the ischemic penumbra was coined to describe this intermediate zone of ischemia between functionally normal and dead brain tissue. Restoration of normal CBF to the penumbral zone may reverse the functional disturbance.
Over the past 25 years, many investigators and clinicians have taken poetic liberties with the ischemic penumbra to suit their technologies and purposes. To some it is any variable that is intermediate in value between normal and that measured within the infarct. To others it is simply any noninfarcted brain with reduced CBF. To still others it is that region that is the optimal target of stroke therapy, destined for infarction if untreated but potentially salvageable if effectively treated. This last interpretation is of greatest relevance for the stroke patient and for the development of stroke therapies, and thus defines the modern ischemic penumbra.
To the originators of the concept, the penumbra was defined by the tip of a microelectrode. Neither multitracer PET nor diffusion-perfusion MRI nor any noninvasive neuroimaging technique can accurately measure the penumbra by the original definition. None have determined reliable, validated absolute thresholds for the upper and lower CBF boundaries of the penumbral zone, and none will. As we have argued elsewhere,3 the very notion of a specifiable absolute CBF threshold of tissue viability is meaningless if it is not integrated with temporal, therapeutic, and tissue factors. Definitions of penumbra that do not account for the time course of the physiological perturbation and the effects of physiological or pharmacological manipulations will be of limited value. The quantitative precision and range of metabolic variables measurable by PET should, in principle, make it the method of choice for imaging the human penumbra. However, limited numbers of PET centers exist and even fewer that can routinely study patients within the critical first few hours after a stroke. This fact and other practical limitations related to availability, radiation exposure, and arterial catheterization constrain the use of PET as a tool for managing acute stroke patients and assessing investigational therapies.
By contrast, diffusion and perfusion MRI of the less-than-6-hour stroke patient are routinely performed in hundreds of centers and have been a key element in several multicenter acute stroke trials.4 The goal in measuring the penumbra is to identify the patient with salvageable tissue-at-risk that is amenable to therapy. This requires a methodology that can be used emergently and used in large-scale randomized controlled trials to select patients and evaluate interventions. From the initial observations of whole brain diffusion and perfusion MRI in hyperacute stroke patients, it was evident that a larger region of hemodynamic compromise on PWI was present than the region of reduced apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) induced by critically low CBF.5 The ADC on DWI reflects the CBF history of the tissue and evolves into infarction without reperfusion or neuroprotection. Hemodynamic abnormalities on PWI predict the possible futures of lesion evolution, futures affected by reperfusion and other potentially therapeutic interventions. This mismatch region is the tissue-at-risk and related to worse clinical outcome and infarct growth if early reperfusion does not occur.6,7 The importance of this mismatch in predicting lesion expansion and growth has been described in many series from many different centers, and prospectively confirmed in a multicenter clinical trial.8 Quantitative models of multiparametric MRI markers of the penumbra have been developed and may lead to improvements in MRI patient selection beyond qualitative diffusion-perfusion mismatch assessments. Considerable data have emerged suggesting that the selection of patients by the diffusion-perfusion mismatch may identify the appropriate patient for effective intravenous thrombolytic therapy beyond 3 hours from onset,911 and several randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials are in progress to test that hypothesis.
The superior quantification by PET is indisputable but, paradoxically, not relevant to this discussion. What is the better measure of the ischemic penumbra in human stroke? The better technique is the one that will lead to effective stroke therapies. MRI is more likely than PET to achieve that goal.
Footnotes
Section Editors: Geoffry A. Donnan, MD, FRACP and Stephen M. Davis, MD, FRACP
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Stroke Association.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F CHEN, Q LIU, H WANG, Y SUZUKI, N NAGAI, J YU, G MARCHAL, and Y NI Comparing two methods for assessment of perfusion-diffusion mismatch in a rodent model of ischaemic stroke: a pilot study Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 81(963): 192 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.G. Gonzalez Imaging-guided acute ischemic stroke therapy: From "time is brain" to "physiology is brain". AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.W. Schaefer, L. Roccatagliata, C. Ledezma, B. Hoh, L.H. Schwamm, W. Koroshetz, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev First-Pass Quantitative CT Perfusion Identifies Thresholds for Salvageable Penumbra in Acute Stroke Patients Treated with Intra-arterial Therapy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 20 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Schellinger, J. A. Chalela, D.-W. Kang, L. L. Latour, and S. Warach Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Early MR Imaging Vessel Signs in Hyperacute Stroke Patients Imaged <3 Hours and Treated with Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 618 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |