This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/11/2669    most recent 01.STR.0000094763.71864.89v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grasso, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grasso, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Arteriovenous Malformations

(Stroke. 2003;34:2669.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—Age-Dependent Brain AVM Characteristics: What is the Evidence?

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) came to clinical attention more than a century ago,¹ and since that time, they have been recognized as lesions that can cause serious neurological deficits or death. Although AVMs can present mostly with hemorrhage or seizure, the advent of contemporary brain imaging techniques has allowed an increasing number of AVMs to be detected before rupture. Over the last decade, there has been a growing interest in knowing more about the incidence, frequency, and clinical course of these vascular lesions; thus, both retrospective and prospective-based studies offering new insights have accumulated.

Population-based studies have reported that half of the adults with a first presentation of brain AVM have intracranial hemorrhage.² Other important presenting symptoms include seizures, headaches, progressive neurological deficit, pulsatile tinnitus, and other unrelated symptoms that lead to a fortuitous diagnosis.³ Finally, an AVM can be suggested by a distinctive combination of these features.

An understanding of the different modes of presentation and their relative frequencies is important to raise the clinical suspicion of an AVM, so that clinical management is undertaken appropriately. The study by Stapf and colleagues⁴ provides seminal findings in this issue by reporting preliminary results of the Columbia AVM Data Bank, an ongoing prospective study.^5,6 By collecting demographic, clinical, and morphological data on 542 consecutive patients with brain AVM, the authors assessed the effect of age at the time of the diagnostic event on clinical and morphological characteristics of brain AVM.

To define precise criteria of analysis, patients were stratified into 7 . . . [Full Text of this Article]