This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 34/12/2788    most recent 01.STR.0000099963.27578.75v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wermer, M. J.H. Articles by van Gijn, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wermer, M. J.H. Articles by van Gijn, J. Related Collections Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage

(Stroke. 2003;34:2788.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Repeated Screening for Intracranial Aneurysms in Familial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

From the Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to M.J.H. Wermer, MD, Department of Neurology, G03.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3484 CX Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail m.wermer{at}neuro.azu.nl

Background and Purpose— In families with 2 first-degree relatives with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), screening for aneurysms is often recommended. The benefit of repeated screening and the interval at which screening should be performed are unknown. We studied patient compliance and the yield of repeated screening for familial intracranial aneurysms.

Methods— Relatives with familial SAH screened between 1990 and 1997 were advised to return every 5 years for follow-up screening with MR angiography. If neurosurgical clipping had been performed in the past, screening was done with CT angiography. We analyzed the results for the group as a whole and for the subgroups of relatives with and without previous aneurysms.

Results— Of 129 relatives who were advised to undergo further screening, 27 did not return, 74 had 1 repeated screening, and 28 had a second repeated screening. We detected 10 new aneurysms in 9 of the 102 screened relatives (9%), 3 of the 19 relatives with previous aneurysms (16%), and 6 of the 83 relatives without previous aneurysms (7%). One of the 9 subjects with a new aneurysm and 1 other relative had an SAH 3 years after a negative screening procedure.

Conclusions— In persons with familial occurrence of aneurysms, the motivation for repeated screening every 5 years is high and the yield is considerable, particularly in relatives who have been treated for aneurysms in the past. The occurrence of SAH <5 years after a negative screen suggests that screening may have to be repeated at shorter intervals.

Key Words: cerebral aneurysm • computed tomography • magnetic resonance angiography • subarachnoid hemorrhage

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. M. Ruigrok, C. Wijmenga, G. J.E. Rinkel, R. v. Slot, F. Baas, M. Wolfs, A. Westerveld, and Y. B.W.E.M. Roos Genomewide Linkage in a Large Dutch Family With Intracranial Aneurysms: Replication of 2 Loci for Intracranial Aneurysms to Chromosome 1p36.11-p36.13 and Xp22.2-p22.32 Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. M. Ruigrok and G. J.E. Rinkel Genetics of Intracranial Aneurysms Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 1049 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Teasdale, J. M. Wardlaw, P. M. White, G. Murray, E. M. Teasdale, V. Easton, and on behalf of the Davie Cooper Scottish Aneurysm St The familial risk of subarachnoid haemorrhage Brain, July 1, 2005; 128(7): 1677 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.J.H. Wermer, I.C. van der Schaaf, P. Van Nunen, P.M.M. Bossuyt, C.S. Anderson, and G.J.E. Rinkel Psychosocial Impact of Screening for Intracranial Aneurysms in Relatives With Familial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 836 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]