Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:987-993
Published online before print March 20, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/4/987    most recent
01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhogal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Albert, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhogal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Albert, M. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Aphasia
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment

(Stroke. 2003;34:987.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery

Sanjit K. Bhogal, BA (Hon); Robert Teasell, MD Mark Speechley, PhD

From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (S.K.B., R.T.) and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.S.), University of Western Ontario, and St Joseph’s Health Care London (S.K.B., R.T.), Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Robert Teasell, 801 Commissioners Rd East, London, Ontario N6C 5J1, Canada. E-mail robert.teasell{at}sjhc.london.on.ca

Background— It has been speculated that the conflicting results demonstrated across poststroke aphasia therapy studies might be related to differences in intensity of therapy provided across studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between intensity of aphasia therapy and aphasia recovery.

Methods— A MEDLINE literature search was conducted to retrieve clinical trials investigating aphasia therapy after stroke. Changes in mean scores from each study were recorded. Intensity of therapy was recorded in terms of length of therapy, hours of therapy provided per week, and total hours of therapy provided. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between changes in mean scores of outcome measures and intensity of therapy.

Results— Studies that demonstrated a significant treatment effect provided 8.8 hours of therapy per week for 11.2 weeks versus the negative studies that only provided {approx}2 hours per week for 22.9 weeks. On average, positive studies provided a total of 98.4 hours of therapy, whereas negative studies provided 43.6 hours of therapy. Total length of therapy time was found to be inversely correlated with hours of therapy provided per week (P=0.003) and total hours of therapy provided (P=0.001). Total length of therapy was significantly inversely correlated with mean change in Porch Index of Communicative Abilities (PICA) scores (P=0.0001). The number of hours of therapy provided in a week was significantly correlated to greater improvement on the PICA (P=0.001) and the Token Test (P=0.027). Total number of hours of therapy was significantly correlated with greater improvement on the PICA (P<0.001) and the Token Test (P<0.001).

Conclusions— Intense therapy over a short amount of time can improve outcomes of speech and language therapy for stroke patients with aphasia.

Aphasia Therapy Works!

Martin L. Albert, MD, PhD, Guest Editor



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
D. G Theodoros
Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology
J Telemed Telecare, July 1, 2008; 14(5): 221 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language DisordersHome page
J. B. Lee and L. R. Cherney
The Changing "Face" of Aphasia Therapy
Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, April 1, 2008; 18(1): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. M. Raymer, P. Beeson, A. Holland, D. Kendall, L. M. Maher, N. Martin, L. Murray, M. Rose, C. K. Thompson, L. Turkstra, et al.
Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): S259 - S275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. C. Marshall
The Impact of Intensity of Aphasia Therapy on Recovery
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e48 - e48.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. K. Bhogal, N. Foley, R. Teasell, and M. Speechley
Response to Letter by Marshall
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e49 - e49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A.M.O. Bakheit, S. Shaw, L. Barrett, J. Wood, S. Carrington, S. Griffiths, K. Searle, and F. Koutsi
A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 885 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A.M.O. Bakheit, S. Shaw, S. Carrington, and S. Griffiths
The rate and extent of improvement with therapy from the different types of aphasia in the first year after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 941 - 949.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. E. Hillis
Aphasia: Progress in the last quarter of a century
Neurology, July 10, 2007; 69(2): 200 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Behavioral, Temporal, and Spatial Targets for Cellular Transplants as Adjuncts to Rehabilitation for Stroke
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 832 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Moss and M. Nicholas
Language Rehabilitation in Chronic Aphasia and Time Postonset: A Review of Single-Subject Data
Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 3043 - 3051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. T. Engelter, M. Gostynski, S. Papa, M. Frei, C. Born, V. Ajdacic-Gross, F. Gutzwiller, and P. A. Lyrer
Epidemiology of Aphasia Attributable to First Ischemic Stroke: Incidence, Severity, Fluency, Etiology, and Thrombolysis
Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1379 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. Weinrich, M. Stuart, and T. Hoyer
Rules for Rehabilitation: An Agenda for Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2005; 19(2): 72 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Rehabilitation after Stroke
N. Engl. J. Med., April 21, 2005; 352(16): 1677 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Kastrau, M. Wolter, W. Huber, and F. Block
Recovery From Aphasia After Hemicraniectomy for Infarction of the Speech-Dominant Hemisphere
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): 825 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
B. H. DOBKIN
Neurobiology of Rehabilitation
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1038(1): 148 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. W. Teasell and L. Kalra
What's New in Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 383 - 385.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. J.C. Doesborgh, M. W.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman, D. W.J. Dippel, F. van Harskamp, P. J. Koudstaal, and E. G. Visch-Brink
Effects of Semantic Treatment on Verbal Communication and Linguistic Processing in Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 141 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Intensity Matters in Post-Stroke Aphasia Therapy
Journal Watch Neurology, June 6, 2003; 2003(606): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]