Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:1112-1113
Published online before print March 27, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000065199.60610.C1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/5/1112    most recent
01.STR.0000065199.60610.C1v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nighoghossian, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nighoghossian, N.

(Stroke. 2003;34:1112.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—tPA in Daily Clinical Practice

Norbert Nighoghossian, MD, Guest Editor

Hôpital Neurologique et Neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

In 1995,1 a 2-part randomized trial showed the efficacy of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) when given within 3 hours of onset of symptoms of acute ischemic stroke. Postmarketing studies have demonstrated that intravenous recombinant tPA can be administered appropriately in a wide variety of hospitals setting. If treatment guidelines2 are carefully followed, intravenous tPA for acute ischemic stroke is feasible and shows safety and efficacy comparable to the results from the study by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.3–6 However, although the persuasive results of that study have launched some enthusiasm, safety and efficacy concerns about the use of thrombolysis for ischemic stroke prevail among many neurologists because of the risk of hemorrhage and the small proportion of suitable patients. Further concerns are nourished by a report from "the real world" in which the translation of study results into daily clinical practice seemed to be less easy and more harmful than expected.6,7

In European countries, there is little information about early outcomes after intravenous application of tPA for stroke patients treated in community-based settings. In this issue of Stroke, Heuschmann et al report the largest experience from the German Stroke Registers Study Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Schlaganfall Register [ADSR]). ADSR is a network of regional stroke registers that combines data from 104 academic and community hospitals throughout Germany and represents {approx}5% of all acute stroke hospitals in Germany. Therefore, the description reflects the special situation of the German healthcare system. The main result . . . [Full Text of this Article]