Published online before print May 8, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000072514.79745.7D
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2003;34:1464.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Revisiting the Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy
From the Departments of Health Policy and Medicine (E.A.H., M.R.C.), Neurology (S.T.), and Surgery (L.H.H.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY (A.J.P.); Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY (E.A.); Department of Surgery, Englewood Hospital, Englewood, NJ (H.D.); Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY (G.F.); and Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Correspondence to Ethan A. Halm, MD, MPH, Department of Health Policy, Box 1077, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. E-mail ethan.halm{at}mountsinai.org
Background and Purpose— In the 1980s, carotid endarterectomy was controversial because proof of efficacy was lacking, complication rates were high, and one third of cases were reported to be inappropriate. Since publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), rates of carotid endarterectomy have doubled nationwide. This study assesses the appropriateness and use of carotid endarterectomy since publication of the RCTs.
Methods— Using the literature, we developed a list of 1557 mutually exclusive indications for carotid endarterectomy and asked a panel of national experts to rate the appropriateness of each indication using the RAND methodology. We used these ratings to assess appropriateness in a sample of 2124 patients who underwent the procedure in 1997 to 1998 in 6 hospitals. We also analyzed the reasons for the procedure and rates of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of surgery.
Results— Overall, 84.9% of operations were done for appropriate reasons, 4.5% for uncertain reasons, and 10.6% for inappropriate reasons. Among procedures considered inappropriate, the most common reasons were high comorbidity (46.6%) and minimal stenosis (27.1%). Overall, 72.5% were asymptomatic, 17.4% had a carotid transient ischemic attack, and 10.1% had a stroke. The 30-day rate of death or stroke was 5.47% for symptomatic patients and 2.26% for asymptomatic patients. Among patients having combined carotid and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, the rate was 10.32%. The complication rate in asymptomatic patients with high comorbidity was 5.56%.
Conclusions— Since the RCTs, rates of overuse appear to have fallen considerably, although they are still significant. A major shift has occurred toward operating on asymptomatic patients. Although overall complication rates were low, rates among asymptomatic patients with high comorbidity exceeded recommended thresholds.
Key Words: carotid endarterectomy • complications • health services misuse • outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  E. A. Halm, S. Tuhrim, J. J. Wang, M. Rojas, C. Rockman, T. S. Riles, and M. R. Chassin Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes and Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy: Impact of Patient and Provider Factors Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2493 - 2501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T.L. Chiam, G. S. Roubin, G. Panagopoulos, S. S. Iyer, R. M. Green, C. Brennan, and J. J. Vitek One-Year Clinical Outcomes, Midterm Survival, and Predictors of Mortality After Carotid Stenting in Elderly Patients Circulation, May 5, 2009; 119(17): 2343 - 2348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Halm, S. Tuhrim, J. J. Wang, C. Rockman, T. S. Riles, and M. R. Chassin Risk Factors for Perioperative Death and Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy: Results of the New York Carotid Artery Surgery Study Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 221 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Halm, M. J. Press, S. Tuhrim, J. Wang, M. Rojas, and M. R. Chassin Does Managed Care Affect Quality? Appropriateness, Referral Patterns, and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 448 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Chaturvedi, R. Madhavan, S. Santhakumar, M. Mehri-Basha, and N. Raje Higher Risk Factor Burden and Worse Outcomes in Urban Carotid Endarterectomy Patients Stroke, November 1, 2008; 39(11): 2966 - 2968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Keyhani, L. C Kleinman, M. Rothschild, J. M Bernstein, R. Anderson, and M. Chassin Overuse of tympanostomy tubes in New York metropolitan area: evidence from five hospital cohort BMJ, October 3, 2008; 337(oct03_1): a1607 - a1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. S. Gurm, J. S. Yadav, P. Fayad, B. T. Katzen, G. J. Mishkel, T. K. Bajwa, G. Ansel, N. E. Strickman, H. Wang, S. A. Cohen, et al. Long-Term Results of Carotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 2008; 358(15): 1572 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. I. Levy, J. Mocco, R. M. Samuelson, R. D. Ecker, B. S. Jahromi, and L. N. Hopkins Optimal treatment of carotid artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 11, 2008; 51(10): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 854 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Wolff, J. Guirguis-Blake, T. Miller, M. Gillespie, and R. Harris Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 860 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Samuelson, J. Yamamoto, E. I. Levy, A. H. Siddiqui, and L. N. Hopkins The Argument to Support Broader Application of Extracranial Carotid Artery Stent Technology Circulation, October 2, 2007; 116(14): 1602 - 1610. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. E. Feasby, J. Kennedy, H. Quan, L. Girard, and W. A. Ghali Real-World Replication of Randomized Controlled Trial Results for Carotid Endarterectomy Arch Neurol, October 1, 2007; 64(10): 1496 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Chaturvedi, E. A. Halm, S. Tuhrim, and M. R. Chassin HAS EVIDENCE CHANGED PRACTICE? APPROPRIATENESS OF CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY AFTER THE CLINICAL TRIALS Neurology, July 10, 2007; 69(2): 224 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Fayad Endarterectomy and Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Race at Breakneck Speed Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 707 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Halm, S. Tuhrim, J. J. Wang, M. Rojas, E. L. Hannan, and M. R. Chassin Has evidence changed practice?: Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials Neurology, January 16, 2007; 68(3): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Feasby Is the Canadian health care system better for neurologic care? Neurology, November 28, 2006; 67(10): 1744 - 1747. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Press, M. R. Chassin, J. Wang, S. Tuhrim, and E. A. Halm Predicting Medical and Surgical Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparing the Risk Indexes. Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 914 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Heyer, D. A. Wilson, D. H. Sahlein, J. Mocco, S. C. Williams, R. Sciacca, A. Rampersad, R. J. Komotar, J. Zurica, A. Benvenisty, et al. APOE-{varepsilon}4 predisposes to cognitive dysfunction following uncomplicated carotid endarterectomy Neurology, December 13, 2005; 65(11): 1759 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Martin, D. A. Saloner, T. P. L. Roberts, H. Roberts, O. M. Weber, W. Dillon, S. Cullen, V. Halbach, C. F. Dowd, and R. T. Higashida Carotid Stent Delivery in an XMR Suite: Immediate Assessment of the Physiologic Impact of Extracranial Revascularization AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Samuels Update in Neurology Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 28 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. M. Demaerschalk Literature-Searching Strategies to Improve the Application of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Principles to Stroke Care Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2004; 79(10): 1321 - 1329. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. G. Brott, R. D. Brown Jr, F. B. Meyer, D. A. Miller, H. J. Cloft, and T. M. Sullivan Carotid Revascularization for Prevention of Stroke: Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2004; 79(9): 1197 - 1208. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Kennedy, H. Quan, W. A. Ghali, and T. E. Feasby Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 31, 2004; 171(5): 455 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Ouriel Expert Commentary Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 107 - 108. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nonent, J.-M. Serfaty, N. Nighoghossian, F. Rouhart, L. Derex, C. Rotaru, P. Chirossel, B. Guias, J.-F. Heautot, P. Gouny, et al. Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Demaerschalk Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Education in Cerebrovascular Disease Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 392 - 396. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy: Changing Practice or Changing Standards? Journal Watch Neurology, November 7, 2003; 2003(1107): 1 - 1. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Barr, J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, J. C. Wojak, G. J. Becker, J. F. Cardella, B. Chopko, J. E. Dion, A. J. Fox, R. T. Higashida, et al. Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2020 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Feasby Editorial Comment: How Appropriate Is Carotid Endarterectomy? Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1471 - 1472. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|