Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2003;34:1826-1827
Published online before print July 3, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000083533.81284.0B
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/8/1826    most recent
01.STR.0000083533.81284.0Bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hankey, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hankey, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eikelboom, J. W.

(Stroke. 2003;34:1826.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—Routine Thrombophilia Testing in Stroke Patients Is Unjustified

Graeme J. Hankey, MD, FRCP, FRACP, Guest Editor John W. Eikelboom, MBBS, MSc, FRACP, FRCPA, Guest Editor

Stroke Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
Thrombosis and Haemophilia Service, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
The whole area of laboratory screening for thrombophilias in stroke patients is shrouded in uncertainty as to which (if any) patients to screen, what laboratory tests to order, how to interpret the results, and when to change therapy. To answer these questions, it is important to define the conditions and to consider their prevalence in the community and in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke; the likely attributable risk of stroke for each, if any, of the thrombophilias; the costs of the laboratory tests for thrombophilias; and the effectiveness of the results of testing in optimizing patient management and outcome.


*    What Are the Thrombophilias?
 
There is no internationally accepted definition of thrombophilia, but the term is commonly used to describe disorders of the hemostatic mechanisms that are likely to predispose to thrombosis.1 Thrombophilia may be inherited (deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin; activated protein C resistance resulting from the factor V Leiden mutation; the prothrombin gene [20210 G/A] mutation; and dysfibrinogenemia), acquired (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and anticardiolipin [ACL] antibodies), or mixed or unknown (high levels of coagulation factor VIII, IX, or XI; high levels of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor).


*    How Common Are the Thrombophilias?
 
At least 1 thrombophilic disorder is present in {approx}10% to 15% of the white Western European population,2 and as highlighted in the study by Jerrard-Dunne et al3 in this issue of Stroke, the distribution of blood concentrations of coagulation proteins, and thus diagnostic criteria and prevalence of thrombophilias, varies among other well-defined ethnic groups such as black Caribbeans and black Africans.3 . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. K. Patel and R. Arya
Tests for Hereditary Thrombophilia Are of Limited Value in the Black Population
Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34 (12): e236 - e236.
[Full Text] [PDF]