Published online before print December 18, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000111515.14897.3B
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:1.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
Our Readers Speak
From London Sciences Health Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr Vladimir Hachinski, Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Center, 339 Windermere Rd, London, Ontario N6A 5A5 Canada.
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
We continuously try to improve our journal, but are we succeeding? A readers’ survey was carried out by our publishers, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW), with the American Heart Association’s (AHA) endorsement by direct mail, by e-mail, and through a banner ad on Stroke’s home page. The aim was to determine subscribers’ and nonsubscribers’ perceptions and attitudes toward the journal and to current, new, and planned features, and to verify the readers’ demographic profiles.
The overall response rate was 11.3%, bettering the goal of 10%. Overall, 92% of respondents reported being either "extremely satisfied" or "satisfied" with the current features and contents of the journal. Commonly used adjectives were "comprehensive," "focused," "informative," "current," "interesting," "quality," "relevant," and "up-to-date." Ninety-one percent were "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to recommend Stroke. Ninety percent thought that our journal was "much better" or "better" than other journals; 61% were "most interested" in clinical research, 60% in clinical practice, and 18% in basic science.
On balance, our readers liked the new features that we have introduced: Advances in Stroke, Cochrane Corner, Controversies, and Research Reports.
Regarding potential new features, 57% of respondents were most interested in peer-reviewed, critically appraised topics (CATS) and 15% in continuing medical education (CME).
The readership favored separating clinical and basic science articles and providing additional headings for the types of article according to areas. Stroke is a journal that publishes "reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases from many
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, V. W. Mark, C. Perkins, and G. Uswatte Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2468 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, C. Perkins, M. Ortmann, V. W. Mark, and G. Uswatte Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J Page, P. Levine, A. Leonard, J. P Szaflarski, and B. M Kissela Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Physical Therapy, March 1, 2008; 88(3): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J Page and P. Levine Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Patients With Chronic Stroke Exhibiting Minimal Movement Ability in the Affected Arm Physical Therapy, July 1, 2007; 87(7): 872 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Cohen, K. Masyn, J. Adams, D. Hessl, S. Rivera, F. Tassone, J. Brunberg, C. DeCarli, L. Zhang, J. Cogswell, et al. Molecular and imaging correlates of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1426 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light, and P. A. Thompson The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1189 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. K. King, D. Morris, J. E. Crago, and A. Chatterjee A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1045 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.O. McCarron, G. Davey Smith, and P. McCarron Secular stroke trends: early life factors and future prospects QJM, February 1, 2006; 99(2): 117 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, M. Vignolo, and K. McCulloch Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2493 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Pelz, T. Andersson, P. Lylyk, M. Negoro, and M. Soderman Stroke Review: Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2004 Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 211 - 214. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|