Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:156-157
Published online before print December 11, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000108266.11282.BF
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/156    most recent
01.STR.0000108266.11282.BFv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felberg, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felberg, R. A.

(Stroke. 2004;35:156.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—The MOST Score: Modifying the Open-Artery "Good"–Closed-Artery "Bad" Approach to Thrombolysis Prognosis

Robert A. Felberg, MD, Guest Editor

Department of Neurology, Ochsner Foundation Clinic and Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The rapidity and degree of recanalization has been shown to predict good outcome in thrombolysis of acute ischemic stroke.1,2 However, despite complete recanalization, many patients continue to do poorly. Some never recover function, while others experience deterioration after improvement3 or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Conversely, many patients experience complete recovery despite continued vessel obstruction. Several clinical factors have been shown to predict poor outcome including continued arterial occlusion, slow recanalization, hyperglycemia, systolic hypertension, and early ischemic changes on the baseline CT scan.4,5

In this report, Molina et al prospectively collected patients who presented with acute stroke syndromes with transcranial Doppler (TCD)-demonstrated middle cerebral artery occlusions and were treated using standard intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) protocols.6 Hemodynamic, radiologic, laboratory, and clinical data were examined, and 5 variables were found to be associated with good outcome (defined as a modified Rankin Scale score <=2). These 5 variables (degree of recanalization, site of occlusion, early ischemic CT scan changes, severity of clinical presentation, and presence of moderate hypertension) were then assigned values as part of the scoring tool to predict outcome (the MOST [Multimodal Outcome Score for Stroke Thrombolysis] score).

In line with previous reports, the authors found that presence of recanalization had the strongest predictive value (OR, 4.11; P<0.001). Interestingly, 25% of patients without recanalization experienced a good outcome. Early ischemic changes on CT as measured by the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) were found to be highly predictive as well (OR, 2.98; P=0.0253). These findings suggest that . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. C. Seet, E. C. Lim, B. P. Chan, B. K. Ong, and T. Dziedzic
Serum Albumin Level as a Predictor of Ischemic Stroke Outcome
Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2435 - 2436.
[Full Text] [PDF]