Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:607-612
Published online before print January 15, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000110984.91157.BD
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/607    most recent
01.STR.0000110984.91157.BDv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nasser, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pickard, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nasser, A. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Stroke. 2004;35:607.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Agreement Between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke Using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index

A. Simon Pickard, PhD; Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD; David H. Feeny, PhD; Ashfaq Shuaib, MD; K.C. Carriere, PhD Abdul M. Nasser, MD

From the College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago (A.S.P.); Division of Neurology (A.M.N., A.S.), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (J.A.J., D.H.F.), Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (D.H.F.), and Department of Mathematics and Statistics (K.C.C.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Institute of Health Economics (J.A.J., D.H.F.), Edmonton, Alberta; and Health Utilities Incorporated (D.H.F.), Dundas, Ontario, Canada.

Reprint requests to A. Simon Pickard, PhD, College of Pharmacy, Room 164, 833 S Wood St (MC886), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail pickard1{at}uic.edu

Background and Purpose— Proxy informants can provide information on patients who are limited in ability to self-assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) after stroke. One alternative is to exclude assessments of such patients and attenuate generalizability. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-proxy agreement on the domains and summary scores of the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) after stroke.

Methods— An observational longitudinal cohort of 124 patients hospitalized after ischemic stroke and their family caregivers completed the HRQL measures at baseline and were followed up for 6 months. Patient and proxy agreement was assessed by use of weighted {kappa} or the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results— At baseline, the more observable domains of HRQL demonstrated greater agreement than the more subjective components. Cross-sectional point estimates of agreement were generally acceptable (ICC >0.70) for the EQ-5D Index and HUI3 summary scores when assessed >=1 month after baseline. Agreement between change scores was generally poor to fair (ICC <0.60), but systematic bias was not observed for the indirect preference-based summary scores between baseline and 6 months.

Conclusions— Results suggest that proxy assessments obtained 6 months after stroke are more reliable than those obtained within 2 to 3 weeks after stroke. Although proxy-assessed change scores for indirect preference-based summary scores of the EQ-5D and HUI3 provided suboptimal agreement with patient assessment, limited systematic bias may support their consideration as alternatives to missing data or statistical imputation. Further research into the validity and reliability of proxy assessments is suggested.


Key Words: observer variation • outcome • quality of life • stroke assessment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. J. Carod-Artal, L. F. Coral, D. S. Trizotto, and C. M. Moreira
Self- and Proxy-Report Agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale
Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3308 - 3314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
I. Muus, M. Petzold, and K. C. Ringsberg
Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: Reliability of Proxy Responses
Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 103 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly
Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. S. Williams, T. Bakas, E. Brizendine, L. Plue, W. Tu, H. Hendrie, and K. Kroenke
How Valid Are Family Proxy Assessments of Stroke Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life?
Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2081 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. J. Calvert, N. Freemantle, and J. G.F. Cleland
The impact of chronic heart failure on health-related quality of life data acquired in the baseline phase of the CARE-HF study
Eur J Heart Fail, March 2, 2005; 7(2): 243 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]