Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:e25
Published online before print January 22, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000115532.05870.B8
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/2/e25    most recent
01.STR.0000115532.05870.B8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croquelois, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bogousslavsky, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croquelois, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bogousslavsky, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke

(Stroke. 2004;35:e25.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Cognitive Deficits in Hyperacute Stroke

Alexandre Croquelois, MD Julien Bogousslavsky, MD

Neurology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

We read with great interest in the September issue of Stroke the article by Hillis and co-workers and the editorial comment by Merino and Heilman.1,2 In this very well-conducted study, Hillis et al showed that the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is not a reliable scale for assessing stroke severity and outcome because of the lack of items assessing the neuropsychological aspects of deficit, especially for the right hemisphere but also for the left one. Aphasia3 as neglect4 have been described to be factors of bad outcome after stroke, and we agree with the authors when they ask for a finest evaluation of cognitive deficits in the hyperacute phase of stroke, those factors being clearly underestimated by the NIHSS. This score may be wrongly reassuring in certain situations and patients with major neuropsychological deficit but without a severe sensory-motor deficit may not receive an acute phase treatment because of a too low score (NIHSS >6 was required for rtPA treatment in the NINDS study5).

We recently published results6 that could be considered as a first step in developing a short, easy-to-perform, neuropsychological evaluation for refining strategies of acute phase treatment for stroke. A 10-minute bedside score of aphasia, based on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination,7 was developed for the 4 main modalities of language (spontaneous verbal fluency, repetition, comprehension, and naming) and correlated with penumbra dynamics explored by perfusion computed tomography in the hyperacute period (<6 hours from symptoms onset) and diffusion-weighted MRI at . . . [Full Text of this Article]