Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:770-775
Published online before print February 19, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117574.19517.80
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/770    most recent
01.STR.0000117574.19517.80v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Launois, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudin, A.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Launois, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudin, A.F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2004;35:770.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Units in France Compared With Conventional Care

R. Launois, PhD; M. Giroud, MD; A.C. Mégnigbêto, PharmD; K. Le Lay, MBA; G. Présenté, MA; M.H. Mahagne, MD; I. Durand, MSc A.F. Gaudin, PharmD

From Réseau d’Evaluation en Economie de la Santé, Paris (R.L., A.C.M., K.L., G.P.); Université de Paris XIII, Paris (R.L.); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Service de Neurologie, Dijon (M.G.); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice (M.H.M.); and Laboratoire GlaxoSmithKline, Marly le Roi (I.D., A.F.G.), France.

Correspondence to Professor Robert Launois, REES France, 28 Rue d’Assas, 75006 Paris, France. E-mail launois.reesfrance{at}wanadoo.fr

Background and Purpose— The incidence of stroke in France is estimated at between 120 000 and 150 000 cases per year. This modeling study assessed the clinical and economic benefits of establishing specialized stroke units compared with conventional care.

Methods— Data from the Dijon stroke registry were used to determine healthcare trajectories according to the degree of autonomy and organization of patient care. The relative risks of death or institutionalization or death or dependence after passage through a stroke unit were compared with conventional care. These risks were then inserted with the costing data into a Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of stroke units.

Results— Patients cared for in a stroke unit survive more trimesters without sequelae in the 5 years after hospitalization than those cared for conventionally (11.6 versus 8.28 trimesters). The mean cost per patient at 5 years was estimated at 30 983 for conventional care and 34 638 in a stroke unit. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for stroke units of 1359 per year of life gained without disability was estimated.

Conclusions— The cost-effectiveness ratio for stroke units is much lower than the threshold (53 400 ) of acceptability recognized by the international scientific community. This finding justifies organizational changes in the management of stroke patients and the establishment of stroke units in France.


Key Words: cost-benefit analysis • economics • Markov chains • stroke • stroke units




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Summers, A. Leonard, D. Wentworth, J. L. Saver, J. Simpson, J. A. Spilker, N. Hock, E. Miller, P. H. Mitchell, and on behalf of the American Heart Association Counci
Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Care of the Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): 2911 - 2944.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell
Costs of Stroke Using Patient-Level Data: A Critical Review of the Literature
Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e18 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Saka, V. Serra, Y. Samyshkin, A. McGuire, and C. C.D.A. Wolfe
Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Unit Care Followed by Early Supported Discharge
Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Moodie, D. Cadilhac, D. Pearce, C. Mihalopoulos, R. Carter, S. Davis, G. Donnan, and for the SCOPES Study Group
Economic Evaluation of Australian Stroke Services: A Prospective, Multicenter Study Comparing Dedicated Stroke Units With Other Care Modalities
Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2790 - 2795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J. Alberts, R. E. Latchaw, W. R. Selman, T. Shephard, M. N. Hadley, L. M. Brass, W. Koroshetz, J. R. Marler, J. Booss, R. D. Zorowitz, et al.
Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1597 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. B. Matchar and A. G. Rudd
Health Policy and Outcomes Research 2004
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 225 - 227.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Hanley and W. Hacke
Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Neurology in Stroke
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 205 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]