Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:e59-e60
Published online before print February 12, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117966.47696.3A
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/3/e59    most recent
01.STR.0000117966.47696.3Av1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruigrok, Y.M.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruigrok, Y.M.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, S.

(Stroke. 2004;35:e59.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Familial Intracranial Aneurysms

Y.M. Ruigrok, MD G.J.E. Rinkel, MD

Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience

C. Wijmenga, PhD

Department of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

With interest we have read the study by Wills et al on 346 Finnish families with familial intracranial aneurysms.1 The authors were able to collect an impressively large number of intracranial aneurysms families, defined as at least 2 members with the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.

In their study, the authors describe different characteristics of the collected families, including the determination of the patterns of inheritance. The authors describe that 198 (57.2%) families were consistent with an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, 126 (36.4%) with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, and 19 (5.5%) with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with incomplete penetrance. In 3 (0.9%) families the pattern of inheritance was found to be complex and not consistent with a clear pattern of inheritance.1

However, it is not clear how these patterns of inheritance were determined, as no prespecified criteria for the definition of the modes of inheritance were outlined. Six representative pedigrees of the 346 families were shown in the article. As a representative example of a family with an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, the authors showed family no. 10. In this family no. 10, individuals from both the first and second generation were not affected while 10 out of the 19 individuals of the third generation (of 3 different pairs of parents) were affected, compatible with a segregation ratio of 53% (95% CI 29 to 76). This is in strong contrast to the 25% that is expected in families with a true autosomal . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Gerard Tromp, PhD Shannon Wills, BA

Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich