This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saeed, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saeed, M.

(Stroke. 2004;35:824.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Editorial Comment—Unraveling the Pagodian Architecture of Stroke as a Complex Disorder

Mohammad Saeed, MD

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

The last decade has witnessed an explosion of hospital-based association studies aimed at deciphering the genetic architecture of complex disorders. Most of these studies attempt such major undertakings without taking into consideration the phenotypic heterogeneity of these disorders. The population-based meta-analyses presented by Schulz and colleagues¹ in this issue of Stroke brings home a very significant point: a complex disorder is not a uniform entity, but a composite of several elemental pathologies affecting particular organ system(s).

Most genetic association studies on stroke, for example, pool its various subtypes, amalgamate several ethnicities for the sake of increasing sample size, and genotype only one or a few polymorphisms within candidate genes. In their endeavor to associate a single biallelic polymorphism with a complex disorder, such studies overlook the Factor(s) X which mediate the pathology. In essence, such an association is a jump across the Atlantic. The result is that the literature is flooded with a large number of published papers with extensive heterogeneity and publication bias.

Sporadic stroke, as are most complex disorders, is heterogeneous. It can be divided into two major categories, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, each having several subcategories which can be identified as distinct phenotypes with their own etiologies. In spite of the recognition of these concepts for a long time, Schulz and colleagues are among the very first to provide a proof. They present clear evidence that confirms prior notions about the genetic architecture of stroke: (1) there is greater genetic influence in pathogenesis if the disease develops . . . [Full Text of this Article]