Published online before print March 4, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000121645.44752.f7
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:924.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Trial
From Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (H.F., W.D.W., C.C.), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, University of Leuven, Belgium; Biostatistical Center (G.V.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of the Rehabilitation Center of the Medical Clinic (G.C.S.), Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (C.K.), University Hospital Pellenberg, University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Geriatrics (E.D.), University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Physiotherapy (G.V.H.), Rehabilitation Center Hof ter Schelde, Antwerpen, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (G.V.), O. L. Vr. Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Department of Neurology (P.C.), University of Antwerpen, Belgium.
Correspondence to Hilde Feys, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Tervuursevest 101, B-3001 Heverlee, Leuven, Belgium. E-mail Hilde.Feys{at}flok.kuleuven.ac.be
Background and Purpose— Several studies have investigated the effect of therapeutic interventions for the arm in the acute phase after stroke, with follow-ups at a maximum of 12 months. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of repetitive sensorimotor training of the arm at 5 years after stroke.
Subjects and Methods— One hundred consecutive stroke patients were randomly allocated either to an experimental group that received daily additional sensorimotor stimulation of the arm or to a control group. The intervention period was 6 weeks. Assessments of the patients were made before, midway, and after intervention, and at 6 and 12 months after stroke. In this study, 62 patients were reassessed at 5 years after stroke. The Brunnström-Fugl-Meyer (BFM) test, Action Research Arm (ARA) test, and Barthel index (BI) were used as the primary outcome measures.
Results— At the 5-year follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference for both the BFM and ARA tests in favor of the experimental group. The mean differences in improvement between the groups from the initial evaluation to the 5-year assessment corresponded to 17 points on the BFM and 17.4 on the ARA. No effect was found for the BI. The treatment was most effective in patients with a severe initial motor deficit.
Conclusions— Adding a specific intervention for the arm during the acute phase after a stroke resulted in a clinically meaningful and long-lasting effect on motor function. The effect can be attributed to early, repetitive, and targeted stimulation.
Key Words: stroke • rehabilitation • clinical trial
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. T. Volpe, P. T. Huerta, J. L. Zipse, A. Rykman, D. Edwards, L. Dipietro, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs Robotic Devices as Therapeutic and Diagnostic Tools for Stroke Recovery Arch Neurol, September 1, 2009; 66(9): 1086 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Castel-Lacanal, P. Marque, J. Tardy, X. de Boissezon, V. Guiraud, F. Chollet, I. Loubinoux, and M. Simonetta-Moreau Induction of Cortical Plastic Changes in Wrist Muscles by Paired Associative Stimulation in the Recovery Phase of Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rijntjes, K. Haevernick, A. Barzel, H. van den Bussche, G. Ketels, and C. Weiller Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. T. Volpe, D. Lynch, A. Rykman-Berland, M. Ferraro, M. Galgano, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Alon, A. F. Levitt, and P. A. McCarthy Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 207 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M Pohl, C Werner, M Holzgraefe, G Kroczek, I Wingendorf, G Hoolig, R Koch, and S Hesse Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Blanton, D. M Morris, M. G Prettyman, K. McCulloch, S. Redmond, K. E Light, and S. L Wolf Lessons Learned in Participant Recruitment and Retention: The EXCITE Trial Physical Therapy, November 1, 2006; 86(11): 1520 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-C. Chen, C.-C. Liang, and F.-Z. Shaw Facilitation of Sensory and Motor Recovery by Thermal Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2665 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Pomeroy, C. A. Clark, J. S. G. Miller, J.-C. Baron, H. S. Markus, and R. C. Tallis The Potential for Utilizing the "Mirror Neurone System" to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 4 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. Teasell and L. Kalra What's New in Stroke Rehabilitation: Back to Basics Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 215 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Long-Term Benefit of Early Arm Stimulation in Acute Stroke Journal Watch Neurology, May 7, 2004; 2004(507): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|