Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:e72
Published online before print March 11, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000122625.03978.40
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/4/e72    most recent
01.STR.0000122625.03978.40v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ay, H.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ay, H.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks

(Stroke. 2004;35:e72.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

How Much Should One Rely on Computed Tomography in Patients with TIA in the Era of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Hakan Ay, MD Walter J. Koroshetz, MD

Stroke Service, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the paper by Douglas et al in Stroke.1 The authors report that the 90-day risk of stroke in transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with a new infarction on CT is higher than patients with normal CT. This is an important piece of information, coming out almost 20 years after the original report by Waxman and Toole that first introduced the concept that clinically transient events are not necessarily transient in the brain.2 TIAs often leave footprints, small islands of permanent injury, on the brain. Nonetheless, CT is not the best available technique to pursue such footprints of ischemia. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) offers much greater power in classifying patients who have ischemia as the cause of their reversible neurological deficit. Though more expensive, the cost-effectiveness of MRI might rest in using it to prevent stroke in this subgroup with TIA-associated infarction.

Recent studies using DWI reveal that infarctions in patients with TIAs are often very small.3–5 Rovira et al reported that the lesion size ranged from 2 to 40 mm (mean=15 mm) in their 39 patients with TIA.4 A second study reported that infarction size was less than 15 mm in diameter in 85% of 27 TIA patients with a positive DWI, of which 83% were punctate (<5 mm).5 These small infarctions will be missed by CT and even by conventional magnetic resonance images (T1-, T2-, FLAIR-weighted). These conventional techniques are limited by lower lesion-to-background signal ratio compared with DWI. Diffusion-weighted imaging . . . [Full Text of this Article]

S. Claiborne Johnston, MD, PhD Vanja Douglas, BS

Neurology Department, University of California, San Francisco, California




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Sciolla, F. Melis, and for the SINPAC Group
Rapid Identification of High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attacks: Prospective Validation of the ABCD Score
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]