Published online before print April 1, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125709.17337.5d
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2004;35:1035.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Multicenter Comparison of Processes of Care Between Stroke Units and Conventional Care Wards in Australia
From National Stroke Research Institute (D.A.C., D.C.P., K.J.O., G.A.D), Heidelberg Heights, Victoria, Australia; Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine (J.I.), Southbank, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine (J.M.), Monash University; Level 4 Department of Neurology (S.M.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Medicine (S.M.D., G.A.D.), The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Correspondence to Dominique A. Cadilhac, National Stroke Research Institute, Level 1 Neurosciences Building, Repatriation Hospital, 300 Waterdale Road, Heidelberg Heights, Victoria, Australia 3081. E-mail cadilhac{at}austin.unimelb.edu.au
Background and Purpose— Approximately 23% of Australian hospitals provide Stroke Units (SUs). Evidence suggests that clinical outcomes are better in SUs than with conventional care. Reasons may include greater adherence to processes of care (PoC). The primary hypothesis was that adherence to selected PoC is greater in SUs than in other acute care models.
Methods— Prospective, multicenter, single-blinded design. Models of care investigated: SUs, mobile services, and conventional care. Selected PoC were related to care models and participant outcomes. Data were collected at acute hospitalization (median 9 days) and at medians of 8 and 28 weeks after stroke.
Results— 1701 patients were screened from 8 hospitals, 823 were eligible, and 468 participated. Response rate was 96% at final follow-up. Mean age was 73 years (SD 14). Overall PoC adherence rates for individual care models were SU 75%, mobile service 65%, and conventional care 52% (P<0.001). The adjusted odds of participants being alive at discharge if adhering to all or all but 1 PoC was significant (aOR 3.63; 95% CI: 1.04 to 12.66; P=0.043). Important trends at 28 weeks were found for being at home (aOR 3.09; 95% CI: 0.96 to 9.87; P=0.058) and independent (aOR 2.61; 95% CI: 0.96 to 7.10; P=0.061), with complete PoC adherence.
Conclusion— Adherence to key PoC was higher in SUs than in other models. For all patients, adherence to PoC was associated with improved mortality at discharge and trends found with independence at home, providing support for the need to increase access to stroke units.
Key Words: stroke • stroke units • outcome and process assessment (health care)
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D A Cadilhac, D C Pearce, C R Levi, G A Donnan, and on behalf of the Greater Metropolitan Clinical Tas Improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes with new stroke care units following implementation of a clinician-led, health system redesign programme in New South Wales, Australia Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 329 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bernhardt, N. Chitravas, I. L. Meslo, A. G. Thrift, and B. Indredavik Not All Stroke Units Are the Same: A Comparison of Physical Activity Patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): 2059 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Hinchey, T. Shephard, S. T. Tonn, R. Ruthazer, H. P. Selker, and D. M. Kent Benchmarks and Determinants of Adherence to Stroke Performance Measures Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1619 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bernhardt, H. Dewey, A. Thrift, J. Collier, and G. Donnan A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT): Phase II Safety and Feasibility Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Moodie, D. Cadilhac, D. Pearce, C. Mihalopoulos, R. Carter, S. Davis, G. Donnan, and for the SCOPES Study Group Economic Evaluation of Australian Stroke Services: A Prospective, Multicenter Study Comparing Dedicated Stroke Units With Other Care Modalities Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2790 - 2795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J.M. Scholte op Reimer, D. W.J. Dippel, C. L. Franke, R. J. v. Oostenbrugge, G. de Jong, S. Hoeks, and M. L. Simoons Quality of Hospital and Outpatient Care After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Insights From a Stroke Survey in The Netherlands Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1844 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C Weimar, J Benemann, H-C Diener, and for the German Stroke Study Collaboration Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 77(5): 601 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.-D. Heiss and R. W. Teasel Brain Recovery and Rehabilitation Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 314 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Tooth, K. McKenna, K. Goh, and P. Varghese Length of Stay, Discharge Destination, and Functional Improvement: Utility of the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient Casemix Classification Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1519 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Davis and G. A. Donnan Effective Prophylaxis for Deep Venous Thrombosis After Stroke: Both Low-Dose Anticoagulation and Stockings for Most Cases Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2910 - 2910. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|