Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:1497-1498

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matchar, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matchar, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Thrombolysis
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2004;35:1497.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Comments, Opinions, and Reviews

Editorial Comment—What Can Models Teach Us About Stroke Treatment?

Sorting Out the Missing Bits

David B. Matchar, MD, Guest Editor

Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The report in this issue of Stroke on the cost-effectiveness of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA)1 suggests – with notable uncertainty – that, when compared with standard acute stroke care, thrombolytic therapy provides, on average, greater health benefits (in terms of average quality adjusted life years [QALYs]) at a reasonable average medical cost. This is not itself a unique finding; other similar efforts suggest – with notably greater certainty – that rt-PA is a good value for money.2–4 What have we learned from these modeling exercises? Is it true, as the authors propose, that we need another trial of rt-PA? Before considering the answer, it is useful to briefly review a few basics of disease models – what they are and what they can teach us.

Disease models are mathematical representations of a clinical condition, its development, and its outcome, and models are often used to evaluate the impact of potential diagnostic or therapeutic strategies. These models are usually implemented in computer code, ranging from something as simple as a spreadsheet formula to sophisticated clinical event simulations. Sandercock and colleagues1 frame the question of rt-PA use as a decision tree, with a Markov model as a "calculation engine." The inputs to this model are epidemiological, clinical trial, and health economic data (specifically applicable to the context of the UK National Health Service [NHS]); the outputs are the month-to-month proportion of individuals in various stroke-relevant health states and their health costs.

When properly constructed, outputs of disease models can be used . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombolysis With Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke Assessed by a Model Based on UK NHS Costs
Peter Sandercock, Eivind Berge, Martin Dennis, John Forbes, Peter Hand, Joseph Kwan, Steff Lewis, Richard Lindley, Aileen Neilson, and Joanna Wardlaw
Stroke 2004 35: 1490-1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]