Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2004;35:2226-2232
Published online before print July 22, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000137766.17092.fb
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/9/2226    most recent
01.STR.0000137766.17092.fbv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M.F.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M.F.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Home Care Services
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation

(Stroke. 2004;35:2226.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Comments, Opinions, and Reviews

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Community Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients

M.F. Walker, PhD; J. Leonardi-Bee, MSc; P. Bath, MD; P. Langhorne, PhD; M. Dewey, PhD; S. Corr, PhD; A. Drummond, PhD; L. Gilbertson, MPhil; J.R.F. Gladman, DM; L. Jongbloed, PhD; P. Logan, MPhil C. Parker, MSc

From the University of Nottingham (M.F.W., J.L.-B., P.B., A.D., J.R.F.G., P.Logan), United Kingdom; the University of Glasgow (P.Langhorne), United Kingdom; the University Kings College London (M.D.), United Kingdom; the University of Northampton (S.C.), United Kingdom; Pinderfields Hospital (L.G.), Leeds, United Kingdom; the University of British Columbia (L.J.), Canada; and the University of Sheffield (C.P.), United Kingdom.

Correspondence to Dr Marion Walker, Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, Floor B, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. E-mail marion.walker{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Trials of occupational therapy for stroke patients living in the community have varied in their findings. It is unclear why these discrepancies have occurred.

Methods— Trials were identified from searches of the Cochrane Library and other sources. The primary outcome measure was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) score at the end of intervention. Secondary outcome measures included the Barthel Index or the Rivermead ADL (Personal ADL), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ), and death. Data were analyzed using linear or logistic regression with a random effect for trial and adjustment for age, gender, baseline dependency, and method of follow-up. Subgroup analyses compared any occupational therapy intervention with control.

Results— We included 8 single-blind randomized controlled trials incorporating 1143 patients. Occupational therapy was associated with higher NEADL scores at the end of intervention (weighted mean difference [WMD], 1.30 points, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.47 to 2.13) and higher leisure scores at the end of intervention (WMD, 1.51 points; 95% CI, 0.24 to 2.79). Occupational therapy emphasizing activities of daily living (ADL) was associated with improved end of intervention NEADL (WMD, 1.61 points; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.49) and personal activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91), but not NLQ. Leisure-based occupational therapy improved end of intervention NLQ (WMD, 1.96 points; 95% CI, 0.27 to 3.66) but not NEADL or PADL.

Conclusions— Community occupational therapy significantly improved personal and extended activities of daily living and leisure activity in patients with stroke. Better outcomes were found with targeted interventions.


Key Words: community health services • occupational therapy • rehabilitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
L. Legg, A. Drummond, J. Leonardi-Bee, J R F Gladman, S. Corr, M. Donkervoort, J. Edmans, L. Gilbertson, L. Jongbloed, P. Logan, et al.
Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: systematic review of randomised trials
BMJ, November 3, 2007; 335(7626): 922 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
The Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials (OAST) Co
Can We Improve the Statistical Analysis of Stroke Trials?: Statistical Reanalysis of Functional Outcomes in Stroke Trials * OAST Supplemental Appendix I: Statistical Tests Compared (see Table I) * OAST Supplemental Appendix II: Supplementary Analyses * OAST Supplemental Appendix III: Trial Data (see Tables II and III) * OAST Supplemental Appendix IV: Results (see Table IV)
Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1911 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Young and A. Forster
Review of stroke rehabilitation
BMJ, January 13, 2007; 334(7584): 86 - 90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Sackley, D. T. Wade, D. Mant, J. C. Atkinson, P. Yudkin, K. Cardoso, S. Levin, V. B. Lee, and K. Reel
Cluster Randomized Pilot Controlled Trial of an Occupational Therapy Intervention for Residents With Stroke in UK Care Homes
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2336 - 2341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]