This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, T.-Y. Articles by Latchaw, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, T.-Y. Articles by Latchaw, R. E.

(Stroke. 2005;36:1-a.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letters to the Editor

CT Perfusion Imaging in Cerebral Ischemia

Ting-Yim Lee, PhD

Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute and Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

Vadim Belesky, MD

Clinical Neurosciences, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Paul Kalapos, MD Donald Lee, MD

Department of Radiology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

Vladimir Hachinski, MD

Clinical Neurosciences, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

David Spence, MD

Clinical Neurosciences and, Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

To the Editor:

We read with interest the Guidelines and Recommendations for Perfusion Imaging in Cerebral Ischemia by the Writing Group on Perfusion Imaging, from the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology of the American Heart Association.¹ The authors have succeeded admirably in summarizing the important recent developments of perfusion imaging and their relevance to clinical investigations of cerebral ischemia. We have been involved in the development of the First-Pass Bolus Tracking Methodology of CT Perfusion for over a decade and would like to comment on a few issues raised by the authors concerning this particular methodology.

1. Radiation dose.

The Table is a comparison of the effective dose equivalent² (H_E) of each of the three perfusion imaging methods discussed in the Guidelines that involve the use of ionizing radiation. The effective dose equivalents for the 2 computed tomography (CT) techniques are estimated using the methodology published by Huda et al ³ based on the CT dose index values published for LightSpeed QXi scanners (General Electric Medical Systems). For CT scanners of other models or from other manufacturers, the values in the Table can be scaled proportionally according to the computed tomography dose index value of the scanner relative to the LightSpeed QXi scanner.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

The Table shows that CT perfusion (CTP) imaging does not necessarily give a higher radiation dose to the subject than XeCT and SPECT perfusion imaging. In comparison, a screening head CT scan has an effective dose equivalent of 1.5 mSv.³ With the recent interest in using a saline chaser to shorten . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Richard E. Latchaw, MD

Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology,, University of California at Davis, Davis, California