(Stroke. 2005;36:2389.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neuroscience (M.C., G.O., F.M., G.P.) and Radiology (M.C.M., G.L., C.B.), University of Pisa, and the Service of Neuroradiology AO (M.C., M.P.), Pisa, Italy.
Correspondence to Mirco Cosottini, MD, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pisa, Via Roma n_67, Pisa, Italy 56100. E-mail mircocosottini{at}libero.it
Background and Purpose Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stent (CAS) is an alternative method to endarterectomy in the revascularization of carotid artery stenosis. Protected CAS is currently used to prevent distal embolization. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) is the most sensitive tool to evaluate silent cerebral ischemia. The purpose of this research was to assess the incidence of cerebral embolic lesions during CAS and to evaluate whether cerebral protection devices can reduce the number of silent cerebral ischemia with respect to unprotected CAS.
Methods Fifty-two patients with high-grade internal stenosis underwent CAS; 30 patients (group a) were treated with a cerebral protection device, and 22 (group b) were treated without it. All of the patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and DWI sequences to depict the number of new embolic silent cerebral lesions.
Results Embolic silent cerebral lesions occurred in 30% of CAS. Cerebral protection devices reduce the number of new lesions significantly reducing the consistent lesions ipsilateral to the treated vessel. Inconsistent lesions do not differ in both groups of patients. Clinical, radiological, and procedural variables do not correlate with the appearance of new cerebral lesions.
Conclusions Embolic cerebral lesions detected with DWI are more frequent with unprotected CAS, although they are present also with the use of cerebral protection devices. Probably a part of silent cerebral lesions arise from the procedural maneuver in the aortic arch.
Key Words: angioplasty and stenting carotid stenosis embolism endovascular treatment magnetic resonance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Schofer, M. Arendt, T. Tubler, J. Sandstede, and M. Schluter Late Cerebral Embolization After Emboli-Protected Carotid Artery Stenting Assessed by Sequential Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 571 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Palombo, V. Faraglia, N. Stella, E. Giugni, A. Bozzao, and M. Taurino Late Evaluation of Silent Cerebral Ischemia Detected by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging after Filter-Protected Carotid Artery Stenting AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1340 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schnaudigel, K. Groschel, S. M. Pilgram, and A. Kastrup New Brain Lesions After Carotid Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1911 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Janjua, A. Alkawi, M.F.K. Suri, and A.I. Qureshi Impact of Arterial Reocclusion and Distal Fragmentation during Thrombolysis among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 253 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Veeraswamy, B. G. Rubin, L. A. Sanchez, M. A. Curi, P. J Geraghty, J. C. Parodi, and G. A. Sicard Complications of Carotid Artery Stenting Are Largely Preventable: A Retrospective Error Analysis Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 403 - 408. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Lesley and C. J. Buckley Stent-Angioplasty for Internal-to-External Carotid Artery Anastomotic Stenosis: A Case Report Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2007; 41(3): 262 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Lal Cognitive Function After Carotid Artery Revascularization Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Derdeyn Carotid Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Trial It Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 715 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrup, T. Nagele, K. Groschel, F. Schmidt, E. Vogler, J. Schulz, and U. Ernemann Incidence of New Brain Lesions After Carotid Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2312 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pelz, T. Andersson, M. Soderman, P. Lylyk, and M. Negoro Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2005 Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 309 - 311. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |