Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2005;36:404-406
Published online before print December 29, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000153063.54972.91
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/2/404    most recent
01.STR.0000153063.54972.91v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felten, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Witten, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felten, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Witten, C. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes

(Stroke. 2005;36:404.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Emerging Therapies

The Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Review Process

Clearance of a Clot Retriever for Use in Ischemic Stroke

Richard P. Felten, MS; Neil R.P. Ogden, MS; Carlos Peña, PhD; Miriam C. Provost, PhD; Michael J. Schlosser, MD Celia M. Witten, PhD, MD

From the Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices, Office of Device Evaluation, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md.

Correspondence to Dr C.M. Witten, 9200 Corporate Blvd, HFZ-410, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20815. E-mail cmw@cdrh.fda.gov

Section Editors: Marc Fisher MD Antoni Dávalos MD


Key Words: acute care • stroke, ischemic


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety and effectiveness of a variety of medical products, including drugs, devices, and biological products, and for advancing public health by helping to speed innovations that make treatments more effective, safer, and more affordable. The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) in the FDA is responsible for premarket and postmarket regulation of medical devices. On August 11, 2004 the FDA gave market authorization to the first medical device specifically indicated to retrieve blood clots from the brain in ischemic stroke for patients who fail or are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). This article summarizes the FDA regulatory process for marketing medical devices in general and provides background on the FDA clearance of a clot retriever for ischemic stroke.


*    FDA Medical Device Regulations
 
There are several types of marketing applications that a medical device manufacturer may submit to CDRH. Most medical devices reach the market through either the premarket approval (PMA) process or the premarket notification process (510(k). In fiscal year 2003, the FDA gave market authorization to 4132 devices through the 510(k) program and 31 devices through the PMA program.

Medical device manufacturers submit PMAs for novel devices, also referred to as Class III. These devices tend to be higher risk or raise new types of safety and effectiveness questions that must be answered before approval for marketing. Data in a PMA application must demonstrate a "reasonable assurance" of safety and effectiveness. Manufacturers submit 510(k)s . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. J. Furlan
Ethics and Feasibility of Placebo-Controlled Interventional Acute Stroke Trials
Stroke, September 1, 2009; 40(9): e533 - e534.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. B. Goldstein
Regulatory Device Approval for Stroke: Fair and Balanced?
Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1737 - 1738.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J.-H. Rha and J. L. Saver
The Impact of Recanalization on Ischemic Stroke Outcome: A Meta-Analysis
Stroke, March 1, 2007; 38(3): 967 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Fisher, D. F. Hanley, G. Howard, E. C. Jauch, S. Warach, and for the STAIR Group
Recommendations From the STAIR V Meeting on Acute Stroke Trials, Technology and Outcomes
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 245 - 248.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Hachinski
Why Read, Contribute to, and Promote Stroke?
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 209 - 211.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D. Kim, R. Jahan, S. Starkman, A. Abolian, C.S. Kidwell, F. Vinuela, G.R. Duckwiler, B. Ovbiagele, P.M. Vespa, S. Selco, et al.
Endovascular Mechanical Clot Retrieval in a Broad Ischemic Stroke Cohort
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2048 - 2052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. J. Marder, D. J. Chute, S. Starkman, A. M. Abolian, C. Kidwell, D. Liebeskind, B. Ovbiagele, F. Vinuela, G. Duckwiler, R. Jahan, et al.
Analysis of Thrombi Retrieved From Cerebral Arteries of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2086 - 2093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Khatri, J. Neff, J. P. Broderick, J. C. Khoury, J. Carrozzella, T. Tomsick, and for the IMS-I Investigators
Revascularization End Points in Stroke Interventional Trials: Recanalization Versus Reperfusion in IMS-I
Stroke, November 1, 2005; 36(11): 2400 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. A. Tomsick
Editorial Comment--Mechanical Embolus Removal: A New Day Dawning
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1439 - 1440.
[Full Text] [PDF]