| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2005;36:1348.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cochrane Corner |
From the Elderly Care Research Unit (J.K.), University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; and the Department of Clinical Neurosciences (P.S.), University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Joseph Kwan, Elderly Care Research Unit, Level E (MP 807), Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. E-mail jk@1to1.org
Section Editor: Graeme J. Hankey MD, FRCP
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
The first Cochrane review of in-hospital care pathways for stroke found some evidence that care pathways may increase the use of certain investigations and reduce the likelihood of urinary tract infections and readmission to hospital.5 However, this benefit might be at the expense of a lower quality of life scores and patient satisfaction. The original Cochrane review has recently been updated with the inclusion of several more recent clinical studies. This article summarizes the findings of the updated Cochrane review.6
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Harris Review: hospital based case management does not reduce length of hospital stay or readmissions in adults Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2006; 9(2): 54 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |