(Stroke. 2005;36:1700.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurology (K.B., L.A., J.P., S.D.), Clinical Epidemiology (L.M.), and Radiology (P.D., B.T.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Australia.
Reprint requests to Prof Stephen Davis, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050 Australia. E-mail stephen.davis{at}mh.org.au
Background and Purpose Perfusion-diffusion (PWI-DWI) mismatch may represent the ischemic penumbra. The complexities associated with perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) have restricted its use. Mismatch between stroke severity, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the volume of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (clinical-diffusion mismatch; CDM) has been suggested as a surrogate for PWI-DWI mismatch. We compared CDM with PWI and DWI in acute stroke.
Methods Seventy-nine hemispheric stroke patients were imaged within 24 hours of symptom onset and subacutely (3 to 5 days). CDM was defined as NIHSS
8 and DWI
25 mL. DWI lesion and PWI (Tmax+4s) volumes were measured by planimetric techniques. Acute PWI-DWI mismatch was examined as a continuous variable (mismatch volume=PWIvolDWIvol) and a categorical variable (mismatch=PWIvolDWIvol/DWIvolx100>20%). Early infarct expansion was calculated as DWIsubacute vol/DWIacute vol.
Results In the 54 sub6-hour patients, CDM detected PWI-DWI mismatch with a specificity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 99%), a positive predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 77% to 100%), but a sensitivity of only 53% (95% CI, 34% to 68%). Alternate DWI and NIHSS cutpoints did not improve test performance characteristics. In addition, subacute DWI expansion was significantly greater in patients with CDM (P=0.01) compared with those without.
Conclusions CDM (NIH
8, DWI
25 mL) predicts the presence of PWI-DWI mismatch with high specificity and low sensitivity. CDM also predicts DWI expansion. CDM may be a useful selection tool in acute stroke therapies, including thrombolysis.
Key Words: stroke, acute magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion weighted diagnostic imaging magnetic resonance imaging, perfusion weighted
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. Lev CT/NIHSS Mismatch for Detection of Salvageable Brain in Acute Stroke Triage Beyond the 3-Hour Time Window: Overrated or Undervalued? Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2028 - 2029. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Lansberg, V. N. Thijs, S. Hamilton, G. Schlaug, R. Bammer, S. Kemp, G. W. Albers, and on behalf of the DEFUSE Investigators Evaluation of the Clinical-Diffusion and Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch Models in DEFUSE Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1826 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Caplan Stroke Thrombolysis: Slow Progress Circulation, July 18, 2006; 114(3): 187 - 190. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kumar, S. Savitz, G. Schlaug, L. Caplan, and M. Selim Antiplatelets, ACE inhibitors, and statins combination reduces stroke severity and tissue at risk Neurology, April 25, 2006; 66(8): 1153 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Clinical-CT Mismatch and Thrombolytic Response in Acute Stroke Journal Watch Neurology, November 3, 2005; 2005(1103): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |