doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000180861.54180.FF
(Stroke. 2005;36:e100.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
AHA/ASA-Endorsed Practice Guidelines |
Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care
A Clinical Practice Guideline*
Key Words: AHA/ASA-Endorsed Practice Guidelines • stroke • rehabilitation • quality of life
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Stroke is a leading cause of disability in the United States.1 The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) estimates that 15 000 veterans are hospitalized for stroke each year (VA HSR&D, 1997).
Forty percent of stroke patients are left with moderate functional impairments and 15% to 30% with severe disability.2 Effective rehabilitation interventions initiated early after stroke can enhance the recovery process and minimize functional disability. Improved functional outcomes for patients also contribute to patient satisfaction and reduce potential costly long-term care expenditures.
There are only 45 rehabilitation bed units (RBUs) in the VA today. Many veterans who have a stroke and are admitted to a VA Medical Center will find themselves in a facility that does not offer comprehensive, integrated, multidisciplinary care. In a VA rehabilitation field survey published in December 2000, more than half of the respondents reported that the "rehabilitative care of stroke patients was incomplete, fragmented, and not well coordinated" at sites lacking a RBU (VA Stroke Medical Rehabilitation Questionnaire Results, 2000).
In Department of Defense (DoD) medical treatment facilities, approximately 20 000 active-duty personnel and dependents were seen in 2002 for stroke and stroke-related diagnoses according to ICD-9 coding.3 Comprehensive treatment for stroke patients in DoD medical facilities is given primarily at medical centers. Smaller DoD community hospitals may have limited resources to see both inpatients and outpatients, relying more on the TRICARE network for ongoing stroke rehabilitation services.
A growing body of evidence indicates that patients do better with
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. C. Lo, P. Guarino, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, C. T. Bever, P. W. Duncan, R. J. Ringer, T. H. Wagner, L. G. Richards, D. M. Bravata, et al. Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 775 - 783. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. M. Salbach, P. Veinot, S. Rappolt, M. Bayley, D. Burnett, M. Judd, and S. B. Jaglal Physical Therapists' Experiences Updating the Clinical Management of Walking Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Qualitative Study Physical Therapy, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 556 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Daniel, C. D.A. Wolfe, M. A. Busch, and C. McKevitt What Are the Social Consequences of Stroke for Working-Aged Adults?: A Systematic Review Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): e431 - e440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Martino, F. Silver, R. Teasell, M. Bayley, G. Nicholson, D. L. Streiner, and N. E. Diamant The Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test (TOR-BSST): Development and Validation of a Dysphagia Screening Tool for Patients With Stroke Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): 555 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Kluding and B. Gajewski Lower-Extremity Strength Differences Predict Activity Limitations in People With Chronic Stroke Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 73 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Lindsay BScN PhD, M. Bayley MD, C. Hellings BScH, M. Hill MSc MD, E. Woodbury BCom MHA, S. Phillips MBBS, and (Canadian Stroke Strategy Best Practices and Stand Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (updated 2008) Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 2, 2008; 179(12): S1 - S25. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Lindsay BScN PhD, M. Bayley MD, C. Hellings BA, M. Hill MSc MD, E. Woodbury BCom MHA, S. Phillips MBBS, and (Groupe de redaction Pratiques optimales et normes Recommandations canadiennes pour les pratiques optimales de soins de l'AVC (mise a jour de 2008) Can. Med. Assoc. J., December 2, 2008; 179(12): SF1 - SF29. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Glozier, M. L. Hackett, V. Parag, C. S. Anderson, and for the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) The Influence of Psychiatric Morbidity on Return to Paid Work After Stroke in Younger Adults: The Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003 Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1526 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan Invited commentary. Physical Therapy, October 1, 2007; 87(10): 1304 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al. Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. L Scheets, S. A Sahrmann, and B. J Norton Use of Movement System Diagnoses in the Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Conditions: A Multiple-Patient Case Report Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 654 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, C. Giuliani, K. E. Light, D. Nichols-Larsen, and for the EXCITE Investigators Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, November 1, 2006; 296(17): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|