This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/1/167    most recent 01.STR.0000195180.69904.f2v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van de Port, I. G.L. Articles by Lindeman, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van de Port, I. G.L. Articles by Lindeman, E. Related Collections Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2006;37:167.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Susceptibility to Deterioration of Mobility Long-Term After Stroke

A Prospective Cohort Study

From the Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine Utrecht, Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Utrecht and Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands (I. van de P., G.K., I. van W., E.L.).

Reprint requests to Ingrid G.L. van de Port, MS, Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat, Rembrandtkade 10, 3583 TM Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail i.v.d.port{at}dehoogstraat.nl

Background and Purpose— The aim of the present study was to identify clinical determinants able to predict which individuals are susceptible to deterioration of mobility from 1 to 3 years after stroke.

Methods— Prospective cohort study of stroke patients consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. A total of 205 relatively young, first-ever stroke patients were assessed at 1 and 3 years after stroke. Mobility status was determined by the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and decline was defined as a deterioration of 2 points on the RMI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for mobility decline. The discriminating ability of the model was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results— A decline in mobility status was found in 21% of the patients. Inactivity and the presence of cognitive problems, fatigue, and depression at 1 year after stroke were significant predictors of mobility decline. The multivariate model showed a good fit (Hosmer–Lemeshow test P>0.05), and discriminating ability was good (area under the curve 0.79).

Conclusions— Mobility decline is an essential concern in chronic stroke patients, especially because it might lead to activities of daily living dependence and affects social reintegration. Early recognition of prognostic factors in patients at risk may guide clinicians to apply interventions aimed to prevent deterioration of mobility status in chronic stroke.

Key Words: activities of daily living • cerebrovascular accident • locomotion • prognosis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Verheyden, A. Nieuwboer, L. De Wit, V. Thijs, J. Dobbelaere, H. Devos, D. Severijns, S. Vanbeveren, and W. De Weerdt Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 173 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. F. Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. B. Selley, and R. C. Tallis The Relationship Between Balance, Disability, and Recovery After Stroke: Predictive Validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 341 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Pohl, C Werner, M Holzgraefe, G Kroczek, I Wingendorf, G Hoolig, R Koch, and S Hesse Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]