This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/4/1050    most recent 01.STR.0000206462.09410.6fv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schiemanck, S. K. Articles by Prevo, A. J.H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schiemanck, S. K. Articles by Prevo, A. J.H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information MRI Scans Related Collections CT and MRI Acute Cerebral Infarction Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2006;37:1050.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Predicting Long-Term Independency in Activities of Daily Living After Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

Does Information From MRI Have Added Predictive Value Compared With Clinical Information?

Sven K. Schiemanck, MD; Gert Kwakkel, PhD; Marcel W.M. Post, PhD; L. Jaap Kappelle, MD, PhD Arie J.H. Prevo, MD, PhD

From the Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine (S.K.S., G.K., M.W.M.P., A.J.H.P.), Rehabilitation Center De Hoogstraat Utrecht, the Netherlands; Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience (S.K.S., G.K., M.W.M.P., L.J.K., A.J.H.P.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute for Rehabilitation Research (M.W.M.P.), Hoensbroek, the Netherlands; and Department of Neurology (L.J.K.), University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Sven Schiemanck, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Rehabilitation, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail S.K.Schiemanck{at}amc.uva.nl

Background and Purpose— To investigate whether neuroimaging information has added predictive value compared with clinical information for independency in activities of daily living (ADL) 1 year after stroke.

Methods— Seventy-five first-ever middle cerebral artery stroke survivors were evaluated in logistic regression analyses. Model 1 was derived on the basis of clinical variables; for model 2, neuroimaging variables were added to model 1. Independent variables were stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale), urinary continence, demographic variables (age, gender, relationship, educational level), hospital of admission, and clinical instruments: sitting balance (trunk control test), motor functioning (Motricity Index), and ADL (Barthel Index). Neuroimaging variables, determined on conventional MRI scans, included: number of days to scanning, lesion volume, lesion localization (cortex/subcortex), hemisphere, and the presence of white matter lesions. ADL independency was defined as 19 and 20 points on Barthel Index. Differences in accuracy of prediction of ADL independence between models 1 and 2 were analyzed by comparing areas under the curve (AUC) in a receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results— Model 1 contained as significant predictors: age and ADL (AUC 0.84), correctly predicting 77%. In model 2, number of days to scanning, hemisphere, and lesion volume were added to model 1, increasing the AUC from 0.84 to 0.87, accurately predicting 83% of the surviving patients.

Conclusions— Clinical variables in the second week after stroke are good predictors for independency in ADL 1 year after stroke. Neuroimaging variables on conventional MRI scans do not have added value in long-term prediction of ADL.

Key Words: activities of daily living • magnetic resonance imaging • stroke

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. J. W. van Nes, S. van der Linden, H. T. Hendricks, A. A. van Kuijk, M. Rulkens, W. I. M. Verhagen, and A. C. H. Geurts Is Visuospatial Hemineglect Really a Determinant of Postural Control Following Stroke? An Acute-Phase Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 609 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. C. Johnston, D. P. Wagner, X.-Q. Wang, G. C. Newman, V. Thijs, S. Sen, S. Warach, and for the GAIN, Citicoline, and ASAP Investigators Validation of an Acute Ischemic Stroke Model: Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesion Volume Offer a Clinically Significant Improvement in Prediction of Outcome? * Definitions and Explanations Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1820 - 1825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Schiemanck, G. Kwakkel, M. W. M. Post, and A. J. H. Prevo Predictive Value of Ischemic Lesion Volume Assessed With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Neurological Deficits and Functional Outcome Poststroke: A Critical Review of the Literature Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 492 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]