Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2006;37:1365-1366
Published online before print April 27, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000222914.83670.05
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/6/1365    most recent
01.STR.0000222914.83670.05v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Antidepressants
*Depression
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

(Stroke. 2006;37:1365.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Meta-Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment for Patients With Poststroke Depression

Yan Chen, MPH, PhD, candidate Jeff J. Guo, PhD, Associate Professor

College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

Because of our pharmacoepidemiologic research focus, we reviewed the recent article by Hackett et al entitled "Management of depression after stroke" in the May 2005 issue of Stroke.1 The article provided a critical systematic review of antidepressant therapies after stroke based on 7 treatment trials and 9 prevention trials. In Figure 2,1 the authors compared the antidepressants with placebo in term of average change in depression scores between the baseline and end of treatment. Although there were considerable variations of depression measures as authors mentioned, we believe that it would be more meaningful to provide quantitative overall effectiveness comparisons by using meta-analysis method.2,3 We retrieved and reviewed the original articles listed in Figure 2. It should be noted that, attributable to the predefined selection criteria in the Hackett et al study, the Robinson et al study4 should be included for both treatment and prevention trials because its crossover design did provide the comparisons of the depression scores in the depressed patients between the therapy group and control group. On the other hand, the Lipsey et al5 original article did not provide the detail data (the means and standard deviations at the baseline and end of treatment). Therefore, we thought that the overall effects of antidepressant treatment in term of various depression scores would better be estimated by separating the pretreatment and post-treatment instead of calculating the mean differences. Based on the limited data directly from the retrieved articles,4,6–8 we estimated the overall depression treatment effects. With . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Response to Letter by Chen et al
Maree L. Hackett, Craig S. Anderson, and Allan O. House
Stroke 2006 37: 1367. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]