| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2006;37:2189.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Emerging Therapies |
From the Acute Stroke Programme, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom (M.P., A.M.B.); and the Henry Wellcome Building for Molecular Physiology, Oxford, United Kingdom (M.P.).
Correspondence to Prof Alastair M. Buchan, University of Oxford, Acute Stroke Programme, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Level 7, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom. E-mail alastair.buchan@ndm.ox.ac.uk
Key Words: neuroprotectants
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
The development of the drug is to be commended in that a number of the STAIR criteria4 were followed, but there are questions that are being discussed. Critically, the site of action of NXY-059 has still not been conclusively determined, and this dispute originates from the poor permeability of NXY-059 across the bloodbrain barrier.2,5 Therefore, the question is if NXY-059 eventually exhibits any pharmacological protection by scavenging free radicals in the brain tissue. Alternatively, its mechanism of action might be a manifestation of physiological protection, mediated probably by improving cerebral blood flow.
Another consideration is whether the benefit of NXY-059 at 90 days, after stroke onset, is not a long-term effect, but rather a postponement of the injury. This is supported by the reduction of the odds for improved outcome by NXY-059 compared with placebo, from 7 to 30 to 90 days. Another criticism of the SAINT-I trial is that the modified Rankin scale is used in a nonconventional way,
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Hussain and A. Shuaib Research Into Neuroprotection Must Continue ... but With a Different Approach Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 521 - 522. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fisher, D. C. Hess, and K. Lees Issues Pertaining to the Critiques of the SAINT-I Trial Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): e126 - e127. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |