This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/1/15    most recent 01.STR.0000251696.12445.c4v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaturvedi, S. Articles by Yadav, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chaturvedi, S. Articles by Yadav, J. S.

(Stroke. 2007;38:15.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letters to the Editor

Response to Letter by Kramer et al

Seemant Chaturvedi, MD

Wayne State University, Detroit, Mich

Jay S. Yadav, MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Response:

We would like to thank Dr Kramer and colleagues for their interest in our article. With regard to aspirin and extended release dipyridamole, we are aware of its effectiveness for long-term stroke prevention, and we did mention that use of aspirin and dipyridamole beyond the postprocedure period (>4 weeks) could decrease the rate of long-term stroke events. The reason we did not mention this agent in the immediate postprocedure period is that there is virtually no published data on use of aspirin and dipyridamole in carotid stenting patients. We encourage Dr Kramer and colleagues to publish their data, and if their initial results can be confirmed by other groups, then a randomized study would be appropriate.

With regard to glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors, this is a more complicated area. The use of these potent medications has been clearly linked with cerebral hemorrhages in some case series reports.¹ It is likely that the hemorrhage rate will vary according to several variables, including postprocedure blood pressure control, presence of recent infarction, etc. At the current time, use of these agents on a routine basis is controversial.² Careful, controlled studies of these agents in well-defined populations of carotid stent patients are needed.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures

None.

References

1. Wholey MH, Wholey MH, Tan WA, Toursarkissian B, Bailey S, Eles G, Jarmolowski C. Management of neurological complications of carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2001; 8: 341–353.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Xavier AR, Ionita CC, Kirmani JF, Qureshi AI. Controversies in endovascular therapy for carotid artery stenosis. In: Chaturvedi S, Rothwell PM, eds. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Current and Emerging Treatments. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis; 2005: 25–343.

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/1/15    most recent 01.STR.0000251696.12445.c4v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaturvedi, S. Articles by Yadav, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chaturvedi, S. Articles by Yadav, J. S.