| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:3040.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Research Letters |
From the Departments of Neurosurgery, and Medical Informatics and Integrative Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan.
Correspondence to Hiroyuki Katano, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. E-mail katano{at}med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp
Abstract
Background and Purpose— The aim of the study was to determine whether the Agatston calcium score might be applied as a useful tool for evaluation of carotid stenosis.
Methods— A total of 124 carotid bifurcations were examined with multidetector row CT. Calcium scores were determined according to the method described by Agatston et al.
Results— Agatston scores generally appear appropriate for evaluation of calcified plaques. Calcified lesions with bigger differences between mean and peak Hounsfield unit (HU) in single cases accounted for only 34.3% of those with volume scores under 500 mm3, whereas 81.3% (P<0.001) for those sized >500 mm3.
Conclusions— The Agatston calcium score is useful in evaluating carotid plaques with calcium. We recommend, however, individual analyses for quality (hardness) and quantity (volume) of each large calcified focus (>500 mm3) by multidetector row CT lesions in order to provide indications for surgical treatment of carotid stenosis, carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting.
Key Words: Agatston calcium score atherosclerosis carotid artery stenting carotid endarterectomy carotid plaque carotid stenosis
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |