Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:414-416
Published online before print January 18, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254580.39297.3c
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/2/414    most recent
01.STR.0000254580.39297.3cv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yafeh, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yafeh, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Fibrinolysis
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Thrombolysis

(Stroke. 2007;38:414.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Research Reports

Confirmation of tPA Treatment Effect by Baseline Severity-Adjusted End Point Reanalysis of the NINDS-tPA Stroke Trials

Jeffrey L. Saver, MD Banafsheh Yafeh, MD

From Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, UCLA Stroke Center, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail jsaver{at}ucla.edu

Background and Purpose— Baseline severity-adjusted end point analysis, an emerging approach to the evaluation of primary end points in acute stroke trials, offers a novel means of adjusting trial analysis for baseline imbalances in presenting stroke severity among treatment groups, a factor that has complicated interpretation and reception of the results of the pivotal National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke tissue plasminogen activator (NINDS-tPA) trials.

Methods— The sliding scale dichotomy end point responder analysis applied in recent acute ischemic stroke clinical trials was used to analyze NINDS-tPA stroke trials 1 and 2. Good outcomes were: 3-month Rankin scale=0 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were 1 to 7; 3-month Rankin scale=0 to 1 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were 8 to 14; 3-month Rankin scale=0 to 2 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were >14.

Results— Both of the NINDS-tPA stroke trials showed a statistically significant beneficial treatment effect of tPA. In unadjusted analyses, in trial 1, good outcomes in tPA versus placebo patients were 39.6% versus 28.6% (odds ratio 1.64, P=0.049); in trial 2, 35.7% versus 24.2% (odds ratio 1.74, P=0.024). Among all 624 patients in trials 1 and 2 combined, good outcomes occurred in 37.5% versus 26.3% patients (odds ratio 1.68, P=0.0034). In the 91- to 180-minute onset to treatment time subgroup of patients among whom baseline severity imbalance was particularly severe, good outcomes were noted in 36.1% versus 24.0% (odds ratio 1.80, P=0.021). Odds ratios favoring tPA generally further increased after adjustment for 12 additional covariates known to predict acute stroke outcome.

Conclusion— Baseline-adjusted severity end point reanalysis of the NINDS Stroke tPA trials confirms a beneficial treatment effect of intravenous tPA.


Key Words: acute care • acute Rx • acute stroke • clinical trials • emergency medicine • stroke • stroke care • therapy • thrombolysis • thrombolytic Rx




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. C. Chavez, O. Hurko, F. C. Barone, and G. Z. Feuerstein
Pharmacologic Interventions for Stroke: Looking Beyond the Thrombolysis Time Window Into the Penumbra With Biomarkers, Not a Stopwatch
Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): e558 - e563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Thrombolytic therapy with alteplase for ischaemic stroke
DTB, February 1, 2009; 47(2): 14 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Alberts, R. A. Felberg, L. R. Guterman, S. R. Levine, and for Writing Group 4
Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Stroke Intervention: State of the Art
Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2845 - 2851.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Zwienenberg-Lee, J. Hartman, N. Rudisill, L. K. Madden, K. Smith, J. Eskridge, D. Newell, B. Verweij, M. R. Bullock, A. Baker, et al.
Effect of Prophylactic Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty on Cerebral Vasospasm and Outcome in Patients With Fisher Grade III Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Results of a Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Clinical Trial
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1759 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. L. Saver
Novel End Point Analytic Techniques and Interpreting Shifts Across the Entire Range of Outcome Scales in Acute Stroke Trials
Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3055 - 3062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]