Published online before print February 22, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259661.05525.9a
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:1216.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Missed Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Emergency Department
From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (M.J.V., M.J.S.), Toronto, Canada; the Clinical Epidemiology Unit and the Department of Emergency Services (M.J.S.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto; the Department of Medicine (M.J.S.), University of Toronto; and the Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (M.J.V., M.J.S.), University of Toronto.
Correspondence to Michael J. Schull, G-106, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5. E-mail mjs{at}ices.on.ca
Background and Purpose— Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) can be devastating, yet its initial presentation may be limited to common symptoms and subtle signs, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. Little is known about population rates of misdiagnosis of SAH, or hospital factors that may contribute to it. We estimated the population-based rate of missed SAH among emergency department (ED) patients and examined its relationship with hospital characteristics.
Methods— We studied persons admitted with a nontraumatic SAH to all Ontario hospitals over 3 years (April 2002 to March 2005). SAH was defined as missed if the patient had an ED visit related to the SAH (based on a prespecified definition) in the 14 days before admission. We examined the association between hospital teaching status and missed SAH and explored whether annual ED volume of SAH or CT availability explained this association.
Results— Of 1507 patients diagnosed with SAH, 5.4% (95% CI, 4.3 to 6.6) had a missed diagnosis. The risk was significantly higher among patients triaged as low acuity (odds ratio 2.65; 95% CI, 1.46 to 4.80), as well as in nonteaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02, 4.44). Neither ED SAH volume nor on-site CT availability explained the effect of teaching status.
Conclusions— About 1 in 20 SAH patients are missed during an ED visit. Lower acuity patients are at higher risk of misdiagnosis, suggesting the need for heightened suspicion among patients with minimal clinical findings. The risk is also greater in nonteaching hospitals, but this is not explained by the annual volume of SAHs seen in the ED or access to CT.
Key Words: diagnosis • health services research • subarachnoid hemorrhage
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 1129-1131.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. R. SCHONFELD and M. A McMULLEN Treatment of Brain Aneurysms Radiol. Technol., July 1, 2008; 79(6): 515 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D.P. Breen, C.W. Duncan, A.E. Pope, A.J. Gray, and R. Al-Shahi Salman Emergency department evaluation of sudden, severe headache QJM, June 1, 2008; 101(6): 435 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Edlow, R. E. Rothman, and W. G. Barsan What Do We Really Know About Neurological Misdiagnosis in the Emergency Department? Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 253 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Edlow Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Are We Doing Better? Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1129 - 1131. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|