This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/4/1298    most recent 01.STR.0000259889.72520.07v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roebers, S. Articles by Heuschmann, P. U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roebers, S. Articles by Heuschmann, P. U. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

(Stroke. 2007;38:1298.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Attitudes and Current Practice of Primary Care Physicians in Acute Stroke Management

Sabine Roebers, BSc; Markus Wagner, PhD; Martin A. Ritter, MD; Frank Dornbach, MD; Klaus Wahle, MD Peter U. Heuschmann, MD, MPH

From Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (S.R., P.U.H.), University of Muenster, Germany; German Stroke Foundation (M.W.), Guetersloh, Germany; Department of Neurology (M.A.R.), University of Muenster, Germany; Union of Medical Doctors (F.D.), Dortmund, Germany; Working Group on General Medicine (K.W.), University of Muenster, Germany; Division of Health and Social Care Research (P.U.H.), King’s College London, UK.

Correspondence to Peter U. Heuschmann, MD, MPH, King’s College London, Division of Health and Social Care Research, 7th floor, Capital House, 42 Weston St, London SE1 3QD, UK. E-mail peter.heuschmann{at}kcl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Stroke patients often report that primary care physicians (PCPs) are their first medical contact after onset of symptoms. We studied PCP attitudes and current practice in early management of suspected stroke patients.

Methods— A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 714 general practitioners, internists, and neurologists providing acute primary care for stroke patients in 4 different regions in Germany. PCP attitudes and practices were assessed with standardized questionnaires and case vignettes presenting suspected stroke patients contacting PCPs either by phone or in practice. Factors influencing the decision of the PCPs to admit patients with clear stroke symptoms as medical emergency to hospital were assessed using multivariate analysis.

Results— In total, 395 PCPs participated in the study (55.3%). Most PCPs agreed that stroke (94.7%) and transient ischemic attack (84.8%) were medical emergencies. In case vignettes, admission to hospital as medical emergency was preferred management after first contact to patients with clear stroke symptoms by phone or in practice (68.9% and 65.6%, respectively). Outpatient clarification was the preferred option of PCPs in patients with unclear stroke symptoms contacting PCPs by phone or in practice (54.7% and 75.5%, respectively) and in transient ischemic attack patients (50.9%). Working as general practitioner (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6) and practice location outside metropolitan area (P=0.002) independently decreased probability of admitting suspected stroke patients as medical emergency when first contact to PCPs was by phone. PCP agreement that all stroke and transient ischemic attack patients must be admitted to hospital increased probability for early hospitalization of stroke and transient ischemic attack patients when first contact was in practice (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.3, and odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.8, respectively).

Conclusions— Stroke and transient ischemic attack were well recognized as medical emergencies by PCPs in our study. However, only two-thirds of PCP would immediately admit stroke suspected patients with clear symptoms to hospital as medical emergency.

Key Words: acute management • primary care • stroke