Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2007;38:2270-2274
Published online before print June 28, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.481093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/8/2270    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.481093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavallée, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavallée, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Amarenco, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Carotid and Vertebral A. Dissection
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

(Stroke. 2007;38:2270.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection With Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

Philippa C. Lavallée, MD; Mickaël Mazighi, MD, PhD; Jean-Pierre Saint-Maurice, MD; Elena Meseguer, MD; Halim Abboud, MD; Isabelle F. Klein, MD, PhD; Emmanuel Houdart, MD Pierre Amarenco, MD

From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre (P.C.L., E.M., H.A., P.A.), Bichat University Hospital and Medical School; the Department of Neuroradiology (M.M., J.-P.S.-M., E.H.), Lariboisiere University Hospital and Medical School; and the Department of Radiology (I.F.K.), Bichat University Hospital and Medical School, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Pierre Amarenco, MD, Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat University Hospital, Denis Diderot University and Medical School, 2 rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. E-mail pierre{at}amarenco.net

Background and Purpose— Tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion independently predicts poor outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. Recanalization of internal carotid artery dissection by stent-assisted angioplasty has recently been proposed when anticoagulation fails to prevent a new ischemic event. We recently reported a case of tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion with dissection of the internal carotid artery successfully treated with endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis.

Methods— We compared clinical outcomes in consecutive patients presenting with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion with internal carotid artery dissection within 3 hours of symptom onset who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, treated by either endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis or intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) when an endovascular therapist was unavailable. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were obtained at baseline and after 24 hours. The modified Rankin Scale score was used to assess outcomes at 3 months. Arterial recanalization was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Results— Of 10 patients screened, 6 were treated with endovascular therapy and 4 with intravenous rtPA. Before treatment, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were high and comparable in the 2 groups (17 and 16, respectively). In the endovascular group, all patients achieved middle cerebral artery recanalization with subsequent dramatic improvement versus only 1 patient with middle cerebral artery recanalization in the intravenous rtPA group. At 3 months, 4 patients in the endovascular group had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score=0). In the intravenous rtPA group, 3 patients had a poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score≥3).

Conclusions— Endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis is a promising treatment in tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion due to internal carotid artery dissection and compares favorably with intravenous rtPA.


Key Words: carotid artery • dissection • ischemic stroke • stent




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. W. Baumgartner, D. Georgiadis, K. Nedeltchev, G. Schroth, H. Sarikaya, and M. Arnold
Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection With Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e27 - e28.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. M. Pelz, E. I. Levy, and L. N. Hopkins
Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 268 - 272.
[Full Text] [PDF]