This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/8/2382    most recent STROKEAHA.107.482760v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gao, P. Articles by Ling, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gao, P. Articles by Ling, F. Related Collections Carotid Stenosis

(Stroke. 2007;38:2382.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Progress Review

Correlation Between Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Clinical Symptoms

Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Peng Gao, PhD; Zuo-quan Chen, MS; Yu-hai Bao, MD; Li-qun Jiao, MD Feng Ling, MD, PhD

From the Cerebrovascular Disease Center of Tongji Hospital (P.G., Z.-q.C., F.L.), Tongji University, Shanghai, and the Department of Neurosurgery of Xuanwu Hospital (Y.-h.B., L.-q.J.), Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Correspondence and reprint requests to Feng Ling, 389 Xincun Rd, Putuo District, Shanghai 200065, China. E-mail lingfengdoc{at}yahoo.com.cn

Background and Purpose— We sought to investigate the association between carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and ipsilateral symptoms of cerebral ischemia.

Methods— A search was performed for clinical observational studies comparing the incidence of IPH between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Odds ratios (ORs) for IPH as a factor in the pathogenesis of neurologic events were calculated and combined by a meta-analysis. Interstudy heterogeneity, estimated effects, and methodologic quality of the studies were assessed.

Results— Thirty-one studies were included for analysis. The reported ORs varied widely. Overall, the incidence of IPH in the symptomatic groups was significantly higher than in the asymptomatic group. However, there was an apparent trend for heterogeneity (P<0.00001) between studies. The random-effects summary estimator of ORs was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.57 to 3.22; P<0.00001). To identify potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed. The pooled ORs varied greatly by stratification. Major heterogeneity was found among studies with low quality, microscopic methods of examination, significant effects, small sizes, early publication, and unequal severity of carotid stenosis in both groups. Large, recent, macroscopic, or high-quality studies, as well as studies with equal degrees of stenosis, tended to yield insignificant associations. The methods in defining and evaluating hemorrhage were very heterogeneous. Characterizations of the age, size, number, and location of hemorrhages were poorly reported and highly variable. In addition, a lack of control of confounders and selection bias were frequently identified among studies.

Conclusions— Statistical inferences have suggested a plausible role in the production of cerebral ischemia; however, reliable interpretation was strongly undermined by poor methodologic quality, substantial heterogeneity, and suspicious publication bias. To preciously estimate the underlying correlation, a well-designed study with uniformity in definition and evaluation for IPH might be warranted.

Key Words: asymptomatic carotid stenosis • endarterectomy • intraplaque hemorrhage • symptomatic carotid stenosis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. C. Albuquerque and L. E. Rohde Correlation Between Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage and Clinical Symptoms Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): e84 - e84. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Yuan Carotid atherosclerosis and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 58 - 60. [Full Text] [PDF]